Key facts
- US and Chinese firms are collaborating on the RISC-V chip architecture despite intense tech rivalry.
- Alibaba VP Xiaoning Qi described RISC-V participants as working together as 'one unified ecosystem'.
Despite escalating US-China tech tensions, companies from the United States, China, India, Brazil, and Europe are collaborating on the open-source RISC-V chip architecture, according to executives. Alibaba VP Xiaoning Qi described the ecosystem as unified, while MIPS CTO Yankin Tanurhan noted close cooperation with Chinese firms.

The continued collaboration on RISC-V between US and Chinese entities, despite geopolitical tensions and chip rivalry, suggests that open-source architectures may offer a pathway for continued technological development and cooperation in the semiconductor industry.
Despite escalating US-China tech tensions, cross-border cooperation on the open-source RISC-V chip architecture is deepening, according to executives. MIPS, an intellectual property provider acquired by US chipmaker GlobalFoundries, is collaborating with Chinese firms at an unprecedented level on RISC-V standardization, said CTO Yankin Tanurhan.
Alibaba Group Holding vice-president Xiaoning Qi stated on July 7, 2026, that companies from the United States, China, India, Brazil, and Europe are actively collaborating within the RISC-V ecosystem. Qi described the participants as working together 'as one unified ecosystem' for both edge and cloud applications, promoting goodwill between countries.
RISC-V, an open-standard instruction set architecture, allows for free use and modification of its CPU blueprint, unlike proprietary architectures from Arm or Intel. Its adoption in China has surged due to Washington's tightening export controls, pushing Beijing towards sovereignty-friendly alternatives. Alibaba's semiconductor unit, T-Head, is a prominent contributor to the ecosystem.
Qi's remarks highlight the potential for open-source architectures to create politically neutral spaces in the semiconductor industry, even as governments restrict technology flows. The durability of this cooperation may be tested as policy circles debate whether open-standard bodies could become vectors for technology transfer.
Pick the topics you care about. Get only what matters, on your cadence.