All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to Business & Corporate

Frasers Group ad banned by watchdog amid pricing dispute

Created at 1 Sep · 11:06 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned an online advert by Sports Direct, owned by Frasers Group, for a Puma top, ruling it misled shoppers over the discount's value. This follows a public dispute between Frasers' finance chief and the ASA over pricing regulations.

Key Numbers

£17advertised price of Puma top
£45claimed RRP of Puma top
£43.94price on third-party seller
1982year Frasers Group founded

Who's Involved

Frasers Group
retail group whose advert was banned
Sports Direct
owned by Frasers Group, ran the banned advert
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA)
watchdog that banned the advert
Chris Wootton
Frasers Group finance chief who criticized ASA
Puma
brand of the advertised sports top
Mike Ashley
founder of Frasers Group
Frasers Group ad banned by watchdog amid pricing dispute

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling highlights ongoing tensions between retailers and advertising watchdogs over pricing transparency and the use of recommended retail prices (RRPs) to advertise discounts. Frasers Group's public challenge to the ASA's authority suggests a potential for further disputes over advertising standards and their impact on consumer pricing.

Key facts

  • The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned a Sports Direct advert for a Puma zipped baselayer top.
  • The advert advertised the top for £17 with a claimed RRP of £45.
  • The ASA found Frasers Group could not provide sufficient evidence that the item was generally sold at £45.
  • Frasers' finance chief, Chris Wootton, had recently criticized the ASA's regulations on RRPs.
  • Frasers Group intends to contest the ASA's ruling, calling it 'fundamentally wrong'.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned an online advertisement by Sports Direct, a company owned by Frasers Group, for a Puma sports top. The ASA ruled that the advert, which offered the top for £17 and claimed a recommended retail price (RRP) of £45, was misleading because Frasers could not provide sufficient evidence that the item was generally sold at £45 across the market.

This decision comes shortly after Chris Wootton, Frasers' finance chief, wrote to the ASA's chair to criticize its crackdown on 'fake discounts'. Wootton argued that the ASA's RRP regime creates "unreasonable and we say unlawful barriers in the way of vigorous price competition" and makes it harder for retailers to promote genuine discounts to consumers, especially during the cost-of-living crisis. He also stated that the ASA's test for RRPs lacks legal basis and is unworkable for traders.

Frasers Group has vowed to contest the ASA's ruling, asserting that it supplied evidence of the RRP's accuracy which the regulator allegedly ignored. The group maintains that the ASA's application of RRP regulations is detrimental to consumers seeking the best deals and is impractical for businesses. Frasers Group, founded by Mike Ashley, has a history of offering sportswear at low prices and has since expanded into luxury fashion.

Frequently asked questions

The advertisement was for a Puma zipped baselayer top.

The top was advertised at £17, with a claimed recommended retail price (RRP) of £45.

The ASA banned the advert because Frasers Group could not provide sufficient evidence that the item was generally sold at the claimed RRP of £45 across the market.

Frasers Group stated it will contest the ruling, calling it 'fundamentally wrong' and arguing the ASA's RRP test is legally unfounded and unworkable.

What Happens Next

01Frasers Group will contest the ASA's ruling.
02The ASA may continue to enforce its regulations on RRPs for other retailers.

How It Developed

The ASA banned a Sports Direct advert for a Puma top.
The advert claimed a recommended retail price (RRP) of £45 for an item sold at £17.
The ASA ruled the advert was misleading as Frasers could not prove the £45 RRP was generally sold across the market.
Frasers' finance chief, Chris Wootton, had previously criticized the ASA's crackdown on RRPs.
Wootton argued the ASA's RRP regime created barriers to price competition and harmed consumers during the cost-of-living crisis.
Frasers Group stated it would contest the ruling, claiming the ASA ignored evidence and that the RRP test is legally unfounded and unworkable.

Sources

T1
‘Misleading’ Frasers ad banned amid feud with watchdogCity AM

Related Stories

WPP to cut up to 1,000 jobs as part of restructuring
1 Sep · 4:17 AM
TCL sues Samsung over 'Mini LED' television advertising
1 Sep · 3:32 PM
Tamara Box Appointed Chair of Anthesis Group Following CEO Exit
1 Sep · 1:11 PM
Pizza Hut CEO Aaron Powell Resigns Following Sale
1 Sep · 10:22 PM
Man City in talks to sign Chelsea's Enzo Fernandez for £120m
1 Sep · 4:26 PM