All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to AI & Technology

AI is disproportionately impacting entry-level jobs, Stanford study finds

Created at 24 Aug · 9:51 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

A Stanford University study indicates that artificial intelligence is causing significant job losses for younger workers in certain fields, with employment for 22-25 year olds in AI-exposed occupations down 19% compared to less exposed fields.

Key Numbers

19 percententry-level job loss in AI-exposed fields
22 to 25age range of affected workers
13 percentprevious year's employment gap
11 percentdecline in top 40% AI-impacted jobs for young workers since 2022
10 percentgrowth in least AI-impacted jobs for young workers since 2022

Who's Involved

Stanford University
conducted the study on AI's impact on entry-level jobs
Erik Brynjolfsson
lead researcher of the Stanford study
ADP
HR management company whose payroll data was used
Anthropic
developed the Economic Index used to gauge AI usage
AI is disproportionately impacting entry-level jobs, Stanford study finds

↳ Why This Matters

The findings suggest a potential widening gap in the labor market, where established workers may retain their positions while new entrants face significant barriers to starting their careers due to AI-driven automation, potentially leading to long-term economic and social implications for younger generations.

Key facts

  • Employment for workers aged 22-25 in the most AI-exposed occupations is 19% below peers in less exposed fields.
  • This gap has widened from 13% in the previous year's study.
  • The phenomenon is driven by lower hiring rates for entry-level workers in AI-impacted fields.
  • Jobs where AI is used for 'automation' show the worst relative employment levels for young workers.
  • Occupations with higher codified knowledge have slower entry-level employment growth.
  • Jobs with a higher share of college graduates show more muted differences between AI-exposed and less-exposed occupations.

New research from Stanford University economists suggests that artificial intelligence is significantly impacting entry-level jobs, particularly for younger workers. The updated study, "Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence," released in August 2026, indicates that employment levels for workers aged 22 to 25 in the most AI-exposed occupations have fallen by 19 percent compared to their peers in less AI-disrupted fields. This gap has widened from 13 percent a year prior.

The researchers utilized anonymized payroll data from ADP and assessed AI exposure using previous impact gauges and Anthropic's Economic Index, which analyzes the use of AI models like Claude. While overall employment across the economy shows minimal differences between AI-exposed and less-exposed jobs, the disparity is stark for young workers. Since 2022, employment in the top 40 percent of AI-impacted jobs for this age group has decreased by approximately 11 percent, while employment in the least AI-impacted jobs grew by 10 percent.

This trend is primarily attributed to lower hiring rates for entry-level positions in AI-impacted fields, rather than increased layoffs or employee departures. The study also found that jobs where AI is used for 'automation' are experiencing the most severe relative employment declines for young workers. Conversely, jobs that use AI for 'augmentation' show more mixed results, and occupations with higher codified knowledge are seeing slower entry-level employment growth.

Furthermore, the research suggests that higher education may act as a buffer against AI's employment effects. Occupations with a greater proportion of college graduates exhibit less pronounced differences in employment between AI-exposed and less-exposed sectors. Lead researcher Erik Brynjolfsson expressed concern over these trends, warning of a future where existing jobs persist but the entry points for new careers may effectively close.

Frequently asked questions

Workers aged 22 to 25 are most affected, with employment in AI-exposed fields down 19% compared to less exposed fields.

The study indicates that lower hiring rates for entry-level workers in AI-impacted fields are the main cause, rather than increased firings.

Yes, occupations with a higher share of college graduates show more muted differences in employment between AI-exposed and less-exposed sectors.

'Automative' AI fully replaces human tasks, leading to job declines, while 'augmentative' AI assists human workers, showing flatter or rising employment.

What Happens Next

01Further analysis of AI's long-term impact on different age demographics and job types is expected.
02Policymakers may consider interventions to support entry-level workers affected by AI displacement.

How It Developed

Stanford researchers updated their study on AI's employment effects.
Employment for 22-25 year olds in AI-exposed jobs is down 19% compared to less exposed jobs.
Last year, this gap was 13%, indicating a widening trend.
The study found lower hiring rates, not increased firings, are the primary cause.
AI's 'automative' uses are linked to declining entry-level employment.
Jobs requiring 'codified' knowledge show slower entry-level growth.
Occupations with a higher share of college graduates show muted AI employment differences.

Sources

T1
AI is hitting entry-level jobs hardest, Stanford study findsvar abtest_2168889 = new ABTest(2168889, 'impression');Ars Technica

Related Stories

Software engineering hiring rebounds, but favors senior roles over early-career engineers
24 Aug · 9:21 AM
OpenAI aims to expand AI agent use beyond coders with ChatGPT Work
24 Aug · 3:21 PM
LinkedIn's 'AI slop' button sees 1M clicks, reduces content views
24 Aug · 4:10 PM
AI data centers drive demand for new solid-state transformer technology
24 Aug · 9:36 PM
UK digital investment doubles, but AI's growth impact questioned
24 Aug · 11:06 AM