All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

Trump administration asks appeals court to lift block on mail-in voting rule

Created at 1 Sep · 1:10 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The Trump administration is appealing a judge's order that blocked new mail-in voting requirements. The Justice Department argues the rule is lawful and necessary for the Postal Service to support mail-in ballots.

Key Numbers

14 daysduration of restraining order
6-3Supreme Court conservative majority
29states allowing mail-in voting without reason
8states conducting elections entirely by mail

Who's Involved

Donald Trump
President whose administration is appealing a mail-in voting rule block
U.S. Department of Justice
Filed appeal to lift judge's order blocking mail-in voting rule
1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Court hearing the administration's appeal
Indira Talwani
U.S. District Judge who issued the restraining order
U.S. Postal Service
Implemented new rule for mail-in voting

↳ Why This Matters

The administration's appeal centers on the federal government's authority to set rules for mail-in voting, a process that has become a focal point of political debate and legal challenges. The outcome could impact how mail-in ballots are handled in the upcoming elections.

Key facts

  • The Trump administration is seeking to lift a court order that blocked new mail-in voting requirements.
  • The Justice Department argued the rule is lawful and consistent with the Postal Service's authority.
  • A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order, concluding the rule risked disenfranchising voters.
  • The administration may appeal to the Supreme Court if the current appeals court does not intervene.

The Trump administration on Monday urged a U.S. appeals court to overturn a judge's order that had temporarily blocked new requirements for mail-in voting. The Justice Department argued that the rule, implemented by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), is lawful and necessary for supporting mail-in ballots ahead of the November congressional elections.

A federal district judge had issued a temporary restraining order, concluding that the USPS rule risked disenfranchising voters and was likely unlawful. The judge declined to pause her order, which will remain in effect for 14 days while she considers a longer-term injunction. The administration contends that the lawsuit is based on a false premise that the USPS intends to take over election administration.

Justice Department lawyers told the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the district judge's ruling was "gravely mistaken." They asserted that the rule's improvements to USPS infrastructure for sensitive mail are within the postal service's statutory and constitutional authority. If the appeals court does not lift the order, the administration may seek intervention from the Supreme Court.

The USPS rule, issued following an executive order signed by President Trump in March, mandates that states provide USPS with lists of mail ballot recipients and that all ballot envelopes bear unique barcodes. The USPS may refuse to deliver ballots that do not comply with these standards or are associated with voters not on the provided lists. All 50 states permit some form of mail-in voting, with 29 allowing it without a specific reason and eight conducting elections entirely by mail.

Frequently asked questions

The rule requires states to supply the USPS with lists of mail ballot recipients and for all ballot envelopes to bear unique barcodes. The USPS may refuse to deliver non-compliant ballots or those associated with voters not on the lists.

The judge concluded that the USPS rule risked disenfranchising voters and was likely unlawful, potentially violating the Constitution's grant of authority to states for administering elections.

The Justice Department argues the ruling was "gravely mistaken" and that the lawsuit is based on an unfounded premise. They state the rule is consistent with USPS's authority.

What Happens Next

01The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will consider the administration's request to lift the restraining order.
02A hearing is scheduled for Thursday to consider a longer-term injunction.
03The administration may seek intervention from the Supreme Court if the appeals court does not grant relief.

How It Developed

The Trump administration asked a U.S. appeals court to lift a judge's order blocking a new mail-in voting rule.
A lower-court judge issued a temporary restraining order against the rule, citing risks of disenfranchising voters.
The Justice Department argued the judge's ruling was "gravely mistaken" and based on an unfounded premise.
The administration could seek intervention from the Supreme Court if the appeals court declines to halt the order.

Sources

T1
Trump administration asks US appeals court to lift order blocking mail-in voting ruleReuters

Related Stories

Judge rules Trump-era visa cancellations for pro-Palestinian speech unconstitutional
31 Aug · 9:51 AM
Supreme Court allows Trump White House ballroom construction to proceed
31 Aug · 8:12 PM
Trump Approval at 33% as Democrats Show Higher Enthusiasm for Midterms
31 Aug · 7:17 PM
Trump administration announces new drug pricing deals with Bayer, Takeda, CSL
31 Aug · 4:12 PM
GOP committees ask Supreme Court to block ruling on ad rates
31 Aug · 3:41 PM