Key facts
- Sony Music Publishing, Warner Chappell, and other music publishers have sued Anthropic.
- The lawsuit alleges Anthropic illegally used copyrighted works to train its AI model, Claude.
Sony Music Publishing, Warner Chappell, and other music publishers have filed a lawsuit against AI company Anthropic, accusing it of a "brazen campaign" of intellectual property theft. The publishers allege Anthropic illegally used copyrighted works to train its AI model, Claude.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal battles over the use of copyrighted material in training artificial intelligence models and could set significant precedents for AI development and intellectual property rights.
Sony Music Publishing, Warner Chappell, and a group of other music publishers have filed a lawsuit against AI company Anthropic, alleging a "brazen campaign" of intellectual property theft. The suit, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims Anthropic illegally used thousands of copyrighted works to train its AI model, Claude.
The publishers accuse Anthropic of "blatant theft" and "flagrant piracy" through illegal torrenting to obtain millions of copies of books, including those containing lyrics and sheet music. This legal action follows similar intellectual property cases against Anthropic, with some of the same lawyers representing plaintiffs in this new suit also involved in prior litigation.
Notably, Anthropic was previously ordered to pay $1.5 billion in the landmark Bartz v. Anthropic case, where authors accused the AI lab of using copyrighted works for training. While a judge ruled the use of copyrighted works for training was legal, acquiring that content through piracy was not.