Key facts
- NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson stated that arming the Community Security Group (CSG) could be seen as favouritism.
- Hudson emphasized that protecting all community members is the responsibility of the police.
- He expressed a preference for a 'user pays' model, allowing event organizers to pay for police presence.
- The royal commission into antisemitism is examining security arrangements for the Jewish community.
- Some witnesses have lobbied for CSG to be armed following the Bondi terror attack.
- The Australian Jewish Association called for a review of licensed security guards' protective capabilities.
New South Wales Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson has voiced opposition to arming the Community Security Group (CSG), a private security organization serving the Jewish community, stating it could be perceived as favouritism and further divide societal relationships. Appearing before a royal commission examining antisemitism and social cohesion, Hudson emphasized that the police force bears the responsibility for community protection. He suggested a 'user pays' model, where event organizers could fund police presence, as a preferable alternative to arming private security. This stance contrasts with calls from some witnesses, including risk consultant Gavriel Schneider and the Australian Jewish Association, who argue for arming private security at open-air events due to safety concerns, particularly after the Bondi terror attack. The royal commission's interim report noted no legal deficiencies but recommended improved police coordination for Jewish events. NSW Police have introduced new measures, such as an armed response command and a dedicated liaison for major Jewish events, to address security needs.