All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

Lawyer struck off for using fake AI evidence in his own disciplinary case

Created at 4 Sep · 1:31 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

An immigration lawyer has been struck off the register after using AI-generated evidence, including fabricated case citations, in his defense during his own disciplinary proceedings. The tribunal found his actions breached professional conduct rules and undermined the administration of justice.

Key Numbers

41age of lawyer Abhishek Kumar
2024year of criminal conviction
12-monthcommunity order sentence
150hours of unpaid work
42reports of AI misuse received by SRA

Who's Involved

Abhishek Kumar
immigration lawyer struck off for using AI evidence
Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
tribunal that struck off the lawyer
Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
legal regulator that identified false citations
Lawyer struck off for using fake AI evidence in his own disciplinary case

↳ Why This Matters

This case marks the first time a tribunal has dealt with AI hallucinations, highlighting the risks of AI misuse in the legal profession and the potential for such technology to undermine justice and professional integrity.

Key facts

  • An immigration lawyer, Abhishek Kumar, has been struck off the register.
  • Kumar used AI-generated evidence, including fake case citations, in his defense during his disciplinary proceedings.
  • He was previously convicted in 2024 for employing a disqualified individual and paying them cash in hand.
  • The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found his actions breached professional conduct rules and undermined the administration of justice.
  • The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) identified the AI-generated false information.

An immigration lawyer has been struck off the professional register after submitting AI-generated evidence, including fabricated case citations, as part of his defense in his own disciplinary proceedings. Abhishek Kumar, 41, was referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) following a criminal conviction in 2024 for knowingly employing a disqualified vulnerable adult and paying them "cash in hand." Kumar, who represented himself, used AI to draft his defense, which contained misleading quotations and non-existent cases. When the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) identified these false citations, Kumar sent an email apology that also contained further AI-generated false material. He accepted that his actions breached professional principles and failed to uphold the administration of justice, stating he had no intention to mislead but lacked expertise to verify AI output. However, the SDT dismissed his excuses, ruling that the harm caused by both the immigration violation and the AI misuse was high. The tribunal made it clear that Kumar would have been struck off for either offense independently. He is now prohibited from practicing law.

Frequently asked questions

Abhishek Kumar was struck off for using AI-generated evidence, including fake case citations, in his defense during his own disciplinary proceedings, and for a prior criminal conviction related to employment practices.

The AI-generated evidence was used in Kumar's written defense to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) and in a subsequent apology email to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) ruled that Kumar's actions caused significant harm and ordered that he be struck off the register, meaning he can no longer practice law.

Yes, this is the first time the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) has had to deal with the issue of AI hallucinations.

What Happens Next

01The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is investigating further AI misuse cases.
02The legal and professional services industry continues to grapple with 'AI hallucination' issues.

How It Developed

Abhishek Kumar, 41, a registered foreign lawyer, was referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) following a 2024 criminal conviction.
Kumar was convicted for knowingly employing a disqualified vulnerable adult and paying them cash in hand.
Kumar defended himself at the SDT and submitted an AI-drafted written answer containing misleading quotations and non-existent cases.
The legal regulator, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), identified the false citations.
Kumar emailed an explanation and apology, which also contained further false material drafted by AI.
Kumar accepted his actions breached professional principles and failed to uphold the administration of justice.
The SDT dismissed his excuses and ruled the harm caused by his misconduct was high.
Kumar was struck off the register, prohibiting him from practicing law.

Sources

T1
Lawyer struck off for using fake AI evidence in his own disciplinary caseCity AM

Related Stories

Reform UK officials step down after donation probe
3 Sep · 8:06 PM
NYC schools ban student-facing AI platforms for one year
4 Sep · 8:46 AM
Sadiq Khan agrees to text and email search in Palantir legal dispute
3 Sep · 10:11 PM
Man sentenced for aiding escaped prisoner Daniel Khalife
4 Sep · 11:36 AM
Farage's conference overshadowed by 'dodgy money' scandal as aides resign
4 Sep · 1:06 PM