All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

Hyperliquid Policy Center Urges SEC, CFTC to Harmonize Perpetuals Rules

Created at 24 Aug · 2:46 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The Hyperliquid Policy Center has asked U.S. regulators to create consistent rules for perpetual contracts, suggesting that classification should depend on a contract's structure and trading method. This aims to bring more perpetual markets under U.S. oversight.

Key Numbers

$480 billionperpetual contract volume traded through Hyperliquid markets
ten monthsperiod for Hyperliquid volume

Who's Involved

Hyperliquid Policy Center
advocating for harmonized perpetuals rules
SEC
U.S. securities regulator reviewing derivatives rules
CFTC
U.S. derivatives regulator reviewing perpetual contracts
Donald Trump
President stating CFTC Chairman is working on Hyperliquid's U.S. entry
Michael Selig
CFTC Chairman working on compliant path for Hyperliquid

↳ Why This Matters

Harmonizing rules for perpetual contracts could bring significant trading volume and innovation under U.S. regulatory oversight, potentially creating a clearer and more compliant environment for these financial products.

Key facts

  • Hyperliquid Policy Center urged the SEC and CFTC to harmonize rules for perpetual contracts.
  • The group proposed that contract classification should depend on its structure and trading method.
  • Perpetual contracts currently face regulatory uncertainty due to overlapping features of futures and swaps.
  • The proposal suggests that the underlying asset should determine regulatory oversight, not the contract type.
  • Cash-settled equity perpetuals with futures characteristics could be classified as security futures.
  • President Donald Trump indicated CFTC Chairman Michael Selig is working on a compliant path for Hyperliquid to operate in the U.S.
  • The Hyperliquid Policy Center has formally requested that U.S. regulators, specifically the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), establish consistent rules for perpetual contracts. The group advocates for a classification system that depends on each contract's specific structure and trading characteristics, aiming to provide regulatory clarity and potentially open the door for more perpetual markets to operate under U.S. oversight.

    Federal law currently categorizes derivatives primarily as futures or swaps, but perpetual contracts, which lack a fixed expiration date and utilize funding payments to maintain price alignment with underlying assets, share features of both. This ambiguity has created uncertainty regarding their legal treatment. The Hyperliquid Policy Center suggests that the underlying asset should dictate which regulator has jurisdiction, but this reference asset should not alter whether the product is classified as a future or a swap, ensuring similar contracts receive uniform treatment.

    For equity perpetuals, the proposal indicates that cash-settled contracts with traditional futures characteristics could be classified as security futures, a category already overseen by both the SEC and CFTC. This would allow them to be listed on registered securities and futures exchanges under the existing framework.

    This regulatory discussion follows recent actions by both agencies. In May, the CFTC approved the first U.S.-listed perpetual contracts to trade as futures. Both the SEC and CFTC have also solicited public feedback on how existing derivatives rules apply to novel products like perpetuals, considering definitions for swaps, security-based swaps, futures, and security futures.

    Furthermore, the Hyperliquid Policy Center urged regulators to maintain flexibility for exchanges in product listing decisions and to update the security futures framework to accommodate newer contract structures. Clarity could be provided through interpretive guidance, policy statements, or staff actions, with formal rulemaking potentially following as regulators gain more experience.

    The proposal coincides with efforts to bring more perpetual trading under domestic oversight. President Donald Trump recently stated that CFTC Chairman Michael Selig is working on a compliant pathway for Hyperliquid to enter the United States. Over the past ten months, Hyperliquid markets have facilitated more than $480 billion in perpetual contract volume across commodities, currencies, equity indices, and individual stocks.

    Frequently asked questions

    Perpetual contracts are derivatives that do not have a fixed expiration date. Instead of expiring, they use funding payments to keep their prices aligned with the referenced assets.

    Perpetual contracts share characteristics of both futures and swaps, which are regulated differently under U.S. law, creating ambiguity about which agency has jurisdiction and how they should be treated.

    The center proposes that the classification of perpetual contracts should depend on their structure and how they trade, and that the underlying asset should determine regulatory oversight.

    In May, the CFTC approved the first U.S.-listed perpetual contracts, allowing them to trade as futures.

    What Happens Next

    01Regulators could provide initial clarity through interpretive guidance, policy statements, or staff action.
    02Formal rulemaking could follow as agencies gain more experience with perpetual markets.

    How It Developed

    Hyperliquid Policy Center requested SEC and CFTC coordinate treatment of perpetual contracts.
    The group proposed classification based on contract structure and trading method.
    Federal law divides derivatives into futures and swaps, creating uncertainty for perpetual contracts.
    Perpetuals lack fixed expiration and use funding payments to align prices with reference assets.
    The proposal suggests the underlying asset should determine the regulator, not the contract classification.
    Cash-settled equity perpetuals with futures characteristics could qualify as security futures.
    CFTC approved the first U.S.-listed perpetual contracts as futures in May.
    SEC and CFTC are reviewing how existing rules apply to newer derivatives.

    Sources

    T1
    Hyperliquid Policy Center Urges SEC, CFTC to Harmonize Perpetuals RulesCoinGape

    Related Stories

    Coinbase-backed group endorses 32 candidates in US midterm elections
    24 Aug · 12:37 PM
    FTC, Zillow, Redfin Reach Resolution on Antitrust Claims
    24 Aug · 1:19 PM
    Swiss industry fears US tariff gap to EU could hurt exports
    24 Aug · 8:07 AM
    US proposes H-1B visa fee hike to over $100,000
    24 Aug · 1:00 PM
    Brazil, US to meet on tariffs after Lula-Trump call
    24 Aug · 2:40 PM