All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

US fossil fuel lobbyists represent cities seeking climate damages

Created at 25 Aug · 12:16 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Congressional lobbyists representing fossil fuel companies are also working for over 300 local governments seeking funds for climate damage recovery, according to a new analysis. This creates a conflict of interest as these firms lobby against climate action while their clients are being sued for climate-related damages.

Key Numbers

300+local governments represented by fossil fuel lobbyists
568local governments hired fossil fuel lobbyists for non-climate issues
2026year for lobbying disclosures review
2024year New York and Vermont passed climate superfund legislation
13states considering climate superfund laws

Who's Involved

F Minus
organization that conducted analysis on lobbying disclosures
Make Polluters Pay
campaign group that co-authored the analysis
James Browning
founder and executive director of F Minus
Greenberg Traurig
law firm lobbying for both fossil fuel entities and local governments
ExxonMobil
fossil fuel client represented by lobbying firms
American Petroleum Institute (API)
fossil fuel client and opponent of climate superfund legislation
Miami-Dade county
local government hiring Greenberg Traurig for climate-related lobbying
Westchester county
local government hiring Greenberg Traurig
city of Rochester
local government hiring Greenberg Traurig
Cassidy DiPaola
representative from Make Polluters Pay
Brown University Climate and Development Lab (CDL)
research group that published a report on climate superfund bills
Timmons Roberts
head of the Brown University Climate and Development Lab
Trevor Culhane
lead author of the Brown University report
Harriet Hageman
Representative who introduced the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act
Ted Cruz
Senator who introduced the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act
American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers
organization lobbying on the Stop the Climate Shakedowns Act
Koch Companies
organization lobbying on the Stop the Climate Shakedowns Act

↳ Why This Matters

This situation highlights a significant conflict of interest where entities contributing to climate change are simultaneously being paid by local governments to address its consequences, raising questions about the effectiveness of climate policy and the influence of fossil fuel lobbying.

Key facts

  • Lobbyists representing fossil fuel companies are also working for over 300 local governments seeking climate recovery funds.
  • The analysis reviewed congressional lobbying disclosures for the first quarter of 2026.
  • Firms like Greenberg Traurig represent both fossil fuel entities opposing climate accountability legislation and local governments seeking climate mitigation funds.
  • New York and Vermont have passed climate superfund legislation, with 13 other states considering similar laws.
  • Legislation to dismiss climate accountability lawsuits and prohibit climate superfund laws, the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act, has been introduced in Congress.

Congressional lobbyists representing fossil fuel companies are simultaneously working for over 300 local governments that are seeking funding to recover from climate damage, according to a new analysis by F Minus and Make Polluters Pay. The research reviewed lobbying disclosures for the first quarter of 2026 and found that many firms represent both entities that push for continued fossil fuel dependence and local governments advocating for climate action.

James Browning, founder and executive director of F Minus, stated that local governments hiring these firms for climate mitigation, disaster relief, and conservation may not be aware that the same firms also represent clients like ExxonMobil and the American Petroleum Institute, which are accused of blocking climate efforts. This creates a significant conflict of interest, as highlighted by the case of law firm Greenberg Traurig.

Greenberg Traurig has lobbied for fossil fuel entities such as API and ConocoPhillips, opposing state legislation that would hold companies financially accountable for climate-warming emissions. Concurrently, the firm has been hired by Miami-Dade county in Florida to lobby for shoreline protection and Everglades restoration. Westchester county and the city of Rochester in New York have also retained Greenberg Traurig, despite the risk of losing mitigation funds if the firm's fossil fuel clients successfully challenge climate superfund legislation.

New York and Vermont passed climate superfund legislation in 2024, and another 13 states considered similar laws this year. Cassidy DiPaola of Make Polluters Pay noted that despite initial positive conversations with lawmakers, many states saw significant opposition from industry lobbyists, leading to bills being voted down. A Brown University report further indicated that opponents of these bills, including fossil fuel companies, frequently used debunked claims to argue against them, such as the assertion that fees on oil companies would raise global oil prices.

In April, Representative Harriet Hageman and Senator Ted Cruz introduced the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act in the US House and Senate, aiming to dismiss climate accountability lawsuits and prohibit climate superfund laws. Organizations including API, American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, and Koch Companies have disclosed lobbying efforts related to this act.

Frequently asked questions

The conflict arises when lobbyists represent both fossil fuel companies that oppose climate action and local governments seeking funds for climate damage recovery and mitigation.

The law firm Greenberg Traurig is specifically mentioned for lobbying for fossil fuel entities while also representing local governments like Miami-Dade county for climate-related projects.

This is proposed legislation in the US Congress aimed at dismissing climate accountability lawsuits and prohibiting climate superfund laws.

These laws aim to hold fossil fuel companies financially accountable for their historic climate-warming emissions and use that revenue for climate mitigation costs.

What Happens Next

01Further analysis of lobbying disclosures will continue to track these dual representations.
02Additional states may consider or pass climate superfund legislation.
03The Stop Climate Shakedowns Act will proceed through the US House and Senate.

How It Developed

A new analysis found that congressional lobbyists for fossil fuel firms also represent over 300 local governments seeking climate recovery funds.
Researchers identified 568 local governments hiring fossil fuel lobbyists for non-climate related issues, some climate-adjacent.
James Browning of F Minus stated that local governments may be unaware of the dual representation and the firms' opposition to climate efforts.
Law firm Greenberg Traurig lobbies for fossil fuel entities opposing climate accountability legislation while also representing Miami-Dade county for shoreline protection.
Westchester county and Rochester city also hired Greenberg Traurig, potentially losing mitigation funds if the firm's fossil fuel clients succeed in invalidating climate superfund legislation.
Greenberg Traurig did not respond to requests for comment on the perceived conflict of interest.
New York and Vermont passed climate superfund legislation in 2024, with 13 other states considering similar laws.
Cassidy DiPaola of Make Polluters Pay reported that lawmakers voted against climate superfund bills after initial encouraging conversations, citing industry lobbyists' influence.

Sources

T1
US fossil fuel lobbyists also represent hundreds of cities fighting for climate damagesThe Guardian

Related Stories

Trump EPA proposes exempting datacenters from air pollution disclosure
25 Aug · 11:12 AM
US scrutiny deters some Chinese tariff refund claims as others cash in
25 Aug · 3:07 AM
US judge dismisses legal challenge to Trump's offshore drilling expansion
24 Aug · 8:37 PM
India wanted red flags on chip packets and soda. Big Food fought back
25 Aug · 4:12 AM
US Lawmakers Urge Trump Administration to Block Aid to Chinese, Russian Agencies
25 Aug · 10:07 AM