All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to Business & Corporate

Sportradar accused of evading US justice in monopoly dispute

Created at 26 Aug · 8:51 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Sportradar, a betting data giant backed by Michael Jordan, is accused by competitor Altenar of attempting to avoid US legal scrutiny by moving a multi-million dollar dispute to private arbitration in Switzerland. Altenar argues Sportradar abused its dominant market position.

Key Numbers

$4bnSportradar market capitalization

Who's Involved

Sportradar
Jordan-backed betting data giant accused of evading US justice
Altenar
Competitor accusing Sportradar of monopoly and evasion
Michael Jordan
Significant shareholder in Sportradar
Mark Cuban
Significant shareholder in Sportradar
Ted Leonsis
Significant shareholder in Sportradar
Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board
Sportradar's largest shareholder
Sportradar accused of evading US justice in monopoly dispute

↳ Why This Matters

The case highlights potential anti-competitive practices in the lucrative sports betting data market and raises questions about a company's ability to shield itself from US jurisdiction through international arbitration, potentially impacting market fairness and competition.

Key facts

  • Sportradar is accused by competitor Altenar of attempting to avoid US legal scrutiny.
  • Altenar claims Sportradar is trying to move a multi-million dollar legal dispute to private arbitration in Switzerland.
  • Sportradar has exclusive deals with Fifa, UFC, NBA, MLB, and NHL.
  • Altenar alleges Sportradar abused its dominant position by denying access to US data and launching rival products.
  • Sportradar's significant shareholders include Michael Jordan, Mark Cuban, and Ted Leonsis.

Sportradar, a major sports data provider with significant backing from NBA legend Michael Jordan, is facing accusations from competitor Altenar of attempting to evade US legal proceedings. Altenar claims Sportradar is trying to move a multi-million dollar dispute to private arbitration in Switzerland, where the company is headquartered, to avoid "US justice and public scrutiny."

Altenar, which uses Sportradar data to provide betting technology platforms outside the US, alleges that Sportradar has abused its dominant market position. Specifically, Altenar claims Sportradar denied it access to US data while simultaneously launching competing products. Lawyers for Altenar stated in a US federal court filing that while their contract with Sportradar allows for arbitration of disputes concerning international supply relationships, it does not cover US market issues.

"Sportradar is entitled to arbitrate the disputes it actually agreed to arbitrate – disputes concerning the foreign supply relationship governed by the MPA," Altenar's lawyers argued. "It is not entitled to use the MPA as a shield against the Sherman Act in the very market the agreement carved out. The motion to compel arbitration and to stay should be denied in its entirety."

Sportradar, which has exclusive deals with major entities like Fifa, UFC, the NBA, MLB, and NHL, has a market capitalization of approximately $4 billion. Its largest shareholder is the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, with other notable investors including Michael Jordan, Mark Cuban, and Ted Leonsis. A spokesperson for Sportradar stated that the company does not comment on pending litigation.

Frequently asked questions

Altenar accuses Sportradar of abusing its dominant position in the sports data market by denying access to US data and launching rival products, while Sportradar seeks to move the dispute to arbitration in Switzerland.

The main parties are Sportradar and Altenar. Significant investors in Sportradar include Michael Jordan, Mark Cuban, and Ted Leonsis.

Altenar believes Sportradar is using its Swiss headquarters and arbitration clause as a way to avoid US justice and public scrutiny for alleged violations of the Sherman Act in the US market.

What Happens Next

01The US federal court will decide whether to deny Sportradar's motion to move the case to arbitration.
CME Headlines
  • September 2026 Delivery Date Memo - Effective August 24, 2026
    24 Aug · 4:34 PM

How It Developed

Altenar accused Sportradar of trying to shield itself from US justice and public scrutiny.
Sportradar requested the dispute be moved to private arbitration in Switzerland.
Altenar argued that Sportradar abused its dominant position by refusing access to US data and launching rival products.
Altenar stated that the contract for the rest of the world allows for private arbitration, but not for US disputes.
Altenar asked the court to deny Sportradar's motion to compel arbitration and stay the case.

Sources

T1
Jordan-backed Sportradar accused of hiding from justice in monopoly row with rivalCity AM

Related Stories

Burnham opens 'No10 North' in Manchester to shift economic power
25 Aug · 3:31 PM
National lottery faces scrutiny over new boss's gambling industry ties
26 Aug · 5:11 AM
Forbes Suspends Rankings Amid Probe Into $6 Million Payment to Top Editor
25 Aug · 9:21 PM
Vishal Garg disputes Better's CEO termination claims in court
25 Aug · 4:31 PM
Taylor Farms repeatedly failed to report workplace injuries, records show
26 Aug · 10:06 AM