All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

Maryland court blocks Democratic redistricting amendment from November ballot

Created at 26 Aug · 4:41 PM2 sources↑ Market-relevant2 events
IN SHORT

A Maryland judge has blocked a Democratic-backed redistricting amendment from appearing on the November ballot, citing missed deadlines. The ruling is paused pending an appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Key Numbers

July 1deadline for ballot measure certification
2028election year for which districts could be redrawn
8total congressional seats in Maryland
7congressional seats currently held by Democrats in Maryland

Who's Involved

Robert J. Thompson
Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge who issued the ruling
Oversight Project
Conservative group that sued over the amendment
Andy Harris
Republican Representative whose district could be reshaped
Wes Moore
Maryland Governor who called a special session for the amendment

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling impacts Democrats' ability to control congressional district boundaries in Maryland, potentially affecting the balance of power in the House of Representatives in future elections.

Key facts

  • A Maryland court ruled a proposed constitutional amendment for congressional redistricting cannot appear on the November ballot.
  • The judge cited procedural violations by lawmakers regarding ballot measure deadlines.
  • The ruling is paused to allow for an appeal to the Maryland Supreme Court.
  • Democrats sought to redraw congressional districts to potentially gain seats.
  • The amendment aimed to remove requirements for congressional districts to be compact and use natural boundaries.

A Maryland court has ruled that a proposed constitutional amendment, which Democrats hoped would enable them to redraw the state's congressional districts for the 2028 elections, cannot appear on the November ballot. The decision by Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge Robert Thompson cited procedural violations by state lawmakers concerning deadlines for ballot measures. The referendum, approved by the Maryland Legislature, would have allowed voters to ensure that congressional districts are not bound by the same geographic rules as state legislative districts. This change could have potentially allowed Democrats to enshrine an 8-0 gerrymander as soon as the 2028 election. Judge Thompson sided with arguments from the conservative Oversight Project and Republican state lawmakers who sued, stating that lawmakers missed their own July 1 deadline for certifying ballot measure summaries. The state attorney general's office had argued that the deadline did not apply to this specific amendment because lawmakers wrote their own ballot summary. The judge has paused the effect of his ruling to allow for an appeal to the Maryland Supreme Court. This setback for Democrats mirrors similar challenges in other states, such as Virginia, where the Supreme Court invalidated a redistricting ballot measure due to procedural violations.

Frequently asked questions

The court ruled that state lawmakers violated their own deadlines for certifying ballot measures, specifically missing the July 1 deadline for the secretary of state to submit summaries to the state board of elections.

The amendment aimed to allow Democratic lawmakers to draw congressional districts that could cross natural boundaries like the Chesapeake Bay, potentially reshaping a district held by a Republican representative.

The judge has paused the effect of his ruling, allowing for an appeal to the Maryland Supreme Court, which will make the final decision on whether the amendment can be placed on the ballot.

Yes, Virginia's Supreme Court recently invalidated a redistricting ballot measure due to procedural violations. Democrats have pursued similar mid-decade redistricting initiatives in states like California.

What Happens Next

01The ruling will be appealed to the Maryland Supreme Court.
02The state Supreme Court will decide whether the amendment can appear on the November ballot.

How It Developed

A Maryland court ruled a proposed constitutional amendment for congressional redistricting cannot go on the November ballot.
The judge cited procedural violations by lawmakers regarding ballot measure deadlines.
The ruling is paused to allow for an appeal to the Maryland Supreme Court.
Democrats sought to redraw congressional districts to potentially gain seats, targeting a district held by Republican Rep. Andy Harris.
The amendment aimed to remove requirements for congressional districts to be compact and use natural boundaries.

Sources

T1
Maryland court rules Democratic-backed redistricting amendment cannot go on November ballotAP News
T1
Maryland judge blocks Democrats’ redistricting effortPolitico

Related Stories

Democratic states sue to block Trump order limiting mail voting
26 Aug · 3:06 PM
US appeals court blocks GOP from accessing lower candidate TV ad rates
25 Aug · 9:50 PM
Judge chides USPS for mail-in voting rule violation but declines to block it
26 Aug · 2:11 AM
Texas drag show ban struck down again by federal judge
26 Aug · 3:21 PM
FCC Expands Discounted TV Ad Rates to Party Committees, Drawing Criticism
25 Aug · 8:23 PM