Key facts
- Indian activists have filed a court objection to a government proposal for food warning labels.
- The proposal requires a red hexagonal label if a food exceeds limits in at least two of three concerning nutrients: added sugar, salt, or saturated fat.
- Activists argue the current proposal creates an 'industry-friendly loophole' that exempts many harmful products.
- The proposal comes amid rising rates of overweight and obesity in India.
- The Supreme Court is scheduled to review the proposal on September 10.
India is experiencing an intensified food safety crackdown, with regulators conducting raids and suspending operations of numerous eateries and restaurants. This push for stricter food safety standards includes a proposed front-of-pack warning label system for packaged foods high in sugar, salt, or fat. However, this initiative has faced opposition from both the food industry, which argues the proposed thresholds are too strict, and health activists, who contend the rules are too lenient and create loopholes.
The proposal, which would require a red hexagonal stamp on products exceeding limits in at least two of the three concerning nutrients, has been criticized by activists as an 'industry-friendly loophole.' They argue it fails to adequately address public health concerns, particularly regarding sugar content, which contributes to rising rates of overweight and obesity in India. The Supreme Court is set to review the proposal on September 10.
Meanwhile, food safety officials like Tukaram Mundhe in Maharashtra have gained public support for their surprise raids on major restaurant chains and warehouses where food product labels were allegedly being faked. The FSSAI has also taken action against liquor and energy drink companies for improper labeling and promotion. Despite industry lobbying, the government appears committed to implementing warning labels, with plans for stricter rules in a second phase.