All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

High court hears challenge to ban on neo-Nazi White Australia party

Created at 8 Sep · 5:06 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Lawyers for the outlawed White Australia party argued anti-hate laws used to ban the group are authoritarian and breach the constitution, citing a lack of judicial fairness and the implied freedom of political communication.

Key Numbers

15 yearsmaximum prison sentence for supporting the group
1951year of high court ruling on banning Communist party
33-year-oldage of party leader Tom Sewell
200 hourscommunity work for Tom Sewell's sentence

Who's Involved

White Australia party
outlawed neo-Nazi political party challenging ban
Tony Burke
home affairs minister who designated the party illegal
Peter King
barrister for the White Australia party
Shahed Sharify
barrister for the White Australia party
Tom Sewell
leader of the White Australia party
Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation
provided recommendation to ban the party

↳ Why This Matters

The case tests the limits of Australia's anti-hate laws and their potential impact on freedom of political communication and the separation of powers, with implications for how hate groups can be banned and regulated.

Key facts

  • Lawyers for the White Australia party argued anti-hate laws are authoritarian and breach the constitution.
  • The party was designated an illegal hate group in May following a recommendation from the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation.
  • Challenging the ban, lawyers cited the implied freedom of political communication and separation of powers.
  • The government argues the group is not a political party but a rebranded entity seeking protection for racist speech.

Lawyers for the outlawed White Australia party, formerly known as the National Socialist Network, have argued in the high court that anti-hate laws used to ban the group are "authoritarian in nature" and breach the constitution. The party was designated an illegal hate group in May after the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation recommended its prohibition to Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke. The ban carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison for supporting, funding, training, recruiting, or joining the group.

The party's legal challenge centres on two main arguments: that the law breaches the implied freedom of political communication and that handing the decision to ban a group to a minister, rather than a judge, violates the separation of powers. Barristers Peter King and Shahed Sharify argued that a total ban is akin to using a "sledgehammer on a nut" and that the law could be used to ban any political party. They contended that a politician's opinion, without judicial fairness or an avenue for appeal, is an inappropriate basis for such a decision.

The government, in its written submissions, is expected to defend the laws by arguing that the White Australia party is not a genuine political party but a rebranded entity of the National Socialist Network, seeking legal protection for its members' "openly racist and anti-Semitic speech." Members of the party, including its leader Tom Sewell, were present in court. Sewell was previously sentenced for behaving offensively in public, with a magistrate finding he emulated "Nazi thugs of 1930s Berlin" during a stunt outside a Chinese consulate.

Frequently asked questions

The White Australia party, formerly known as the National Socialist Network (NSN), is a neo-Nazi political group that has been designated an illegal hate group in Australia.

The party's lawyers argue that the anti-hate laws are authoritarian, breach the implied freedom of political communication, and violate the separation of powers by allowing a minister to ban a group without judicial oversight.

Activities such as supporting, funding, training, recruiting, or joining the White Australia party are criminal offences with a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.

The government argues that the White Australia party is not a legitimate political party but a rebranded entity seeking legal protection for racist and anti-Semitic speech.

What Happens Next

01The high court will continue to hear arguments over two days this week.

How It Developed

The White Australia party, formerly known as the National Socialist Network, was designated an illegal hate group in May.
The party is challenging the ban at the high court, arguing the law breaches implied freedom of political communication and separation of powers.
Lawyers argued the ban is authoritarian and that political parties cannot be banned by the government.
The government contends the party is not a political entity but an arm of White Australia, seeking legal protection for racist speech.

Sources

T1
Ban on neo-Nazi White Australia party is ‘authoritarian’ and breaches constitution, high court hearsThe Guardian

Related Stories

Australian bureaucrats seek ban on parliamentary hearing clips on social media
7 Sep · 9:16 AM
Man accused of plotting protest at Boris Johnson wedding party
7 Sep · 8:21 PM
Operatives discussed buying luxury cars with developer payments, Icac hears
7 Sep · 5:31 AM
Legal groups challenge Trump’s executive orders on voting
7 Sep · 12:11 PM
Andrew Hastie threatens One Nation with legal action over 'traitor' claims
8 Sep · 5:20 AM