The Justice Department is defending its prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey, arguing his social media post of seashells could be seen as a threat against President Donald Trump. Prosecutors cite Comey's novel as evidence he understood the post to be a threat.
The case questions the intent behind a former FBI director's social media post and whether it constitutes a threat against the sitting president, raising issues of political motivation and the interpretation of online communication.
The Department of Justice is defending its prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey, asserting that a social media post featuring seashells could be interpreted as a threat against President Donald Trump. Prosecutors contend that there is "no serious dispute" that an objective viewer could understand the post, which included the numerical arrangement "86 47," as a call to violence against Trump, the 47th president.
The government's arguments, detailed in recent filings, aim to counter defense efforts to dismiss the case. Prosecutors suggest Comey's post was an attempt to generate attention for his upcoming novel, which features a social media personality whose followers attack his adversaries. They also question Comey's account of finding the seashells on a North Carolina beach, noting their location and the numerical arrangement.
Comey's lawyers have labeled the indictment as vindictive prosecution, stemming from Trump's alleged retribution against a vocal critic. They argue that investigators misled judges and withheld facts, and that the number "86" has common meanings such as "to throw out" or "get rid of," and has been used in protest slogans. The Justice Department denies these allegations, stating the decision to indict was made by the U.S. attorney and not directed by the president or attorney general.
Pick the topics you care about. Get only what matters, on your cadence.