All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

DOJ defends prosecution of James Comey over '8647' seashell post

Created at 19 Aug · 2:36 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The US Department of Justice is defending its prosecution of James Comey, arguing that his social media post featuring seashells arranged to read '8647' could be interpreted as a threat against Donald Trump. Prosecutors claim an objective viewer could understand it as a coded message to 'kill' or 'get rid of' the president.

Key Numbers

47thUS president
8647seashell post number

Who's Involved

James Comey
Former FBI director facing charges for social media post
Donald Trump
US President, target of alleged threat
US Department of Justice
Prosecuting Comey, defending the case in court

↳ Why This Matters

The case highlights the legal complexities surrounding online speech, the interpretation of coded messages as threats, and the potential for political animosity to influence legal proceedings.

Key facts

  • The DOJ argues James Comey's '8647' seashell post could be interpreted as a threat against President Trump.
  • Prosecutors claim an objective viewer could understand the post as a coded message to 'kill' or 'get rid of' Trump.
  • Comey was indicted in April on charges of making and transmitting a threat via social media.
  • Comey's lawyers argue the post is protected speech and not a 'true threat', seeking dismissal.
  • The defense also alleges vindictive prosecution by Trump against Comey.

The US Department of Justice has defended its prosecution of former FBI director James Comey, asserting in new court documents that his social media post featuring seashells arranged to spell '8647' could reasonably be interpreted as a threat against President Donald Trump. Prosecutors argued that an objective viewer would understand the post as a coded message meaning 'kill' or 'get rid of' the president.

Comey was indicted in April by a North Carolina grand jury on charges of making and transmitting a threat against the US president via social media. The post, made while Comey was on vacation, quickly drew criticism from Trump's allies. Comey subsequently deleted the image, stating he had not realized it could be construed as a violent threat and that he opposes violence.

In filings, Comey's lawyers have requested the case be dismissed, contending that the post constitutes protected speech and does not amount to a 'true threat.' They argue that '86' means 'get rid of' or 'eject' and lacks violent connotations, and that no reasonable observer would interpret the phrase '86 47' as a threat of violence. The defense has also alleged that the indictment is a result of 'vindictive and selective prosecution' stemming from Trump's long-standing animosity towards Comey, particularly concerning Comey's handling of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Frequently asked questions

James Comey posted a photo on Instagram of seashells arranged to spell '8647'. Trump supporters interpreted '86' as 'get rid of' and Trump as the 47th president, suggesting a threat.

Comey was indicted on charges of making and transmitting a threat against the US president via social media.

Comey's lawyers argue the post was protected speech, not a 'true threat,' and that the prosecution is politically motivated due to Trump's animosity.

The DOJ contends that an objective viewer could interpret the post as a coded threat to 'kill' or 'get rid of' President Trump.

What Happens Next

01A judge will rule on Comey's motion to dismiss the case.

How It Developed

James Comey posted a photo of seashells arranged to read '8647' on Instagram.
Trump allies quickly denounced the post as a threat against President Trump.
Comey deleted the post, stating he did not realize it could be interpreted as a violent threat.
Comey was indicted in April on charges of making and transmitting a threat against the US president.
The Department of Justice filed court documents defending the prosecution, stating there is 'no serious dispute' the post could be interpreted as a threat.
Comey's lawyers argued the post was protected speech and not a 'true threat', requesting the case be dismissed.
Comey's legal team also alleged 'vindictive and selective prosecution' due to Trump's animosity.

Sources

T1
US justice department defends prosecution of James Comey over ‘8647’ seashell postThe Guardian

Related Stories

DOJ unseals new charges against 17 hackers in Iran-backed campaign
18 Aug · 7:59 PM
DOJ probes Sen. Dan Sullivan for voter confusion; Peltola advances
18 Aug · 10:23 PM
Prosecutors blast ex-Celsius CEO Mashinsky’s bid to vacate sentence
18 Aug · 5:06 PM
Japan calls US sanctions on ICC president 'very unfortunate'
18 Aug · 5:27 PM
Fauci Aide Pleads Guilty to Evading Public Records Laws
18 Aug · 9:25 PM