HomeAll NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

US appeals court blocks Trump order on mail-in voting

Created at 25 Jul · 7:32 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

A federal appeals court has rejected an attempt by the Trump administration to implement an executive order tightening rules for mail-in voting in 23 states. A lower court had previously blocked key parts of the order, deeming them unconstitutional.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

23states where Trump administration sought to implement order
June 25date lower court secured injunction
2020year NAACP originally sued Postal Service
2021year of settlement between NAACP and Postal Service
2028year through which Postal Service agreed to prioritize Election Mail
March 2026date of Trump's executive order

Who's Involved

Donald Trump
U.S. President who signed executive order on mail-in voting
1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
federal appeals court that rejected administration's request
Emmet Sullivan
US District Judge in Washington D.C. who blocked USPS nationwide
NAACP
organization that brought lawsuit against Postal Service
Derrick Johnson
President of NAACP
David Steiner
Postmaster General who testified to Senate
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
appeals court that granted temporary win to Trump administration
US appeals court blocks Trump order on mail-in voting

↳ Why This Matters

The rulings significantly impact the administration's efforts to influence mail-in voting procedures, potentially affecting election integrity and voter access in the upcoming November elections.

Key facts

  • A federal appeals court declined to allow the Trump administration to implement an executive order tightening mail-in voting rules in 23 states.
  • A lower court judge had previously concluded that key parts of the order were unconstitutional.
  • A separate federal judge in Washington D.C. blocked the US Postal Service from carrying out the order nationwide, citing a violation of a settlement.
  • The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals put on hold a lower court ruling, stating the lawsuit was premature and the administration would be irreparably harmed if the rule could not be finalized.
  • The proposed rule would have required states to submit lists of mail-in voters and meet other requirements, with the USPS refusing to deliver ballots from non-compliant states.

A federal appeals court on Saturday declined to allow the Trump administration to implement an executive order aimed at tightening rules for mail-in voting in 23 states ahead of the November elections. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the administration's request to lift an injunction that several Democratic-led states secured in June from a lower-court judge who concluded key parts of the order were unconstitutional.

A separate federal judge in Washington D.C. had previously blocked the U.S. Postal Service nationwide from carrying out the order, finding that the proposal violated a settlement in a 2020 lawsuit against the agency. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that the Postal Service's proposed regulations would violate a 2021 settlement requiring the agency to prioritize the timely delivery of Election Mail.

Trump's order would have required states to submit lists of their mail-in voters and meet other requirements for their mail voting programs. The Postal Service had stated that it would refuse to deliver mail-in ballots in states that do not provide their voter lists. The NAACP, which brought the lawsuit, celebrated the ruling, with President Derrick Johnson stating it was a blow to attempts to "rig the election."

However, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Friday handed the Trump administration a temporary win by putting on hold a lower court ruling that had blocked the USPS from restricting mail-in voting. This three-judge panel ruled that the lawsuit was premature and not covered by the 2021 settlement. The appeals court also stated the administration would be irreparably harmed if the rule could not be finalized before the midterms. While the administration cannot yet move forward nationwide, this ruling signals they may convince other courts to allow implementation while lawsuits proceed.

Frequently asked questions

The order aimed to tighten rules for mail-in voting, requiring states to submit lists of mail-in voters to the U.S. Postal Service and imposing other requirements for mail voting programs.

Critics argued that key parts of the order were unconstitutional and that it would give the federal government unprecedented control over elections, potentially leading to voter purges and impacting voter access.

Multiple federal judges and appeals courts have issued rulings, with some blocking the order nationwide or in specific states, while one appeals court granted a temporary hold on a lower court's decision, allowing the administration to potentially implement the rule while litigation continues.

The order directed the USPS to implement new procedures for handling mail-in ballots, including requiring voter lists from states. Judges have blocked the USPS from carrying out these directives.

What Happens Next

01Further legal challenges and appeals are expected regarding the implementation of the mail-in voting order.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

President Donald Trump signed an executive order aiming to tighten rules for mail-in voting.
A lower court judge blocked key parts of the order, concluding they were unconstitutional.
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the administration's request to lift the injunction.
A separate federal judge in Washington D.C. blocked the US Postal Service from carrying out the order nationwide, finding it violated a settlement in a 2020 lawsuit.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals put on hold a lower court ruling that had blocked the USPS from restricting mail-in voting, stating the lawsuit was premature.
The D.C. Circuit's ruling allows the Trump administration to potentially implement the policy while lawsuits move through the courts, but not nationwide yet.
Sponsored

London Quick Take - 22 July - UK inflation softens, oil rises and chips rally ahead of Alphabet, Tesla earnings

SAXO

Sources

T1
US appeals court rules Trump cannot implement mail-in voting orderReuters
T2
Appeals court gives Trump temporary win in mail-in voting fightabcnews.com
T2
US Postal Service cannot carry out Trump order on mail ballot delivery ...cnn.com

Related Stories

Appeals court rejects Trump bid to halt H-1B visa fee ruling
24 Jul · 10:54 PM
Brazil denies visas to US envoys seeking to question electoral system
25 Jul · 2:30 PM
Trump's New Tariff Strategy Focuses on Durable Trade Wall
25 Jul · 10:04 AM
Troy Jackson secures Democratic nomination for Maine Senate seat
25 Jul · 10:06 AM
India to continue trade talks with US after new tariffs
25 Jul · 1:06 PM