Key facts
- A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration's changes to homelessness funding rules.
- The ruling found that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) violated federal law.
- The judge stated HUD did not adequately consider the impact of the changes on providers and recipients.
- The case centered on the Continuum of Care program, a primary source of funding for homeless services.
- The changes would have significantly reduced funding for permanent housing and prioritized transitional housing with requirements.
A federal judge in Rhode Island has ruled against the Trump administration's attempts to alter funding rules for programs assisting the homeless. U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy stated that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) violated federal law by not adequately considering the impact of its changes on service providers and individuals seeking housing.
In her ruling, McElroy described HUD's actions as "the hallmark of unreasoned decision making" for hastily attempting to eliminate its "Housing First" approach. This strategy prioritizes housing homeless individuals before addressing other issues like addiction or unemployment. The lawsuit, brought by 21 states and the District of Columbia, challenged a sudden shift in how the Continuum of Care program, a key funding source for homelessness services, would be administered.
The proposed changes included a significant reduction in the proportion of funds that could be used for permanent housing, from 90% to 30%, and a redirection of funds towards temporary transitional housing. These programs often impose work or service requirements on residents. HUD had also proposed prioritizing cities that enforced public camping bans and withholding funds from programs that allegedly "facilitate racial preferences" or "violate the sex binary in humans."
While the ruling is a victory for the plaintiffs seeking to overturn these changes, Judge McElroy denied a request for a permanent injunction. This leaves open the possibility for HUD to attempt to implement similar changes at a later date.