Key facts
- Top House Democrats will oppose an amendment to cut $3.3 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel.
- The amendment was proposed by Republican congressman Thomas Massie.
- House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries cited concerns the amendment is "overly broad" and could impact humanitarian aid.
- Pete Aguilar, third-highest ranking House Democrat, also opposed the amendment, emphasizing regional relationships.
- Democrats are calling for a "major reset" in U.S.-Israel relations, advocating for a Palestinian state.
- The debate is influenced by primary election results where candidates critical of Israel have gained traction.
Top House Democrats have declared their intention to vote against an amendment that seeks to cut $3.3 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel. The proposed amendment, put forth by Republican congressman Thomas Massie, is being debated in the context of growing voter discontent over U.S. support for Israel, which has impacted recent primary elections.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries stated in a letter to House Democrats that he would oppose Massie's amendment, deeming it "overly broad." He warned that such a cut could inadvertently affect humanitarian aid programs and complicate efforts to combat militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Jeffries suggested that there are more effective ways to address concerns regarding the current Israeli government and called for a "major reset" in U.S.-Israel relations.
Pete Aguilar, the third-highest ranking House Democrat, echoed Jeffries' opposition, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to foster stronger regional relationships. Both lawmakers indicated that the U.S. should re-evaluate its approach to Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose government has faced international scrutiny over its actions in Gaza.
The debate is occurring as several Democratic incumbents have faced primary challenges from candidates critical of Israel's actions. This trend has been observed in New York and Colorado, and is expected to be a factor in upcoming primaries in Michigan and Missouri. Jeffries also noted that the upcoming expiration of a 10-year memorandum of understanding with Israel presents an opportunity to ensure future agreements strictly adhere to human rights laws and values.
Aguilar acknowledged the need for a change in the U.S.-Israel relationship moving forward but downplayed the immediate impact of the views of lawmakers who might win in November on the leadership's current stance.