HomeAll NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Heathrow expansion would take jobs from other UK regions, report finds

Created at 27 Jul · 4:06 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

An analysis of government forecasts suggests expanding Heathrow Airport would shift thousands of jobs from other UK regions, with nearly 10,000 jobs potentially lost from the West Midlands alone. The findings could impact political support for the project.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

10,000jobs potentially lost from West Midlands
7.5 millionpassengers Birmingham airport could lose annually by 2050
9,500jobs foregone at Birmingham airport and its supply chain
15,200aviation jobs potentially displaced from regions by 2050
6,400jobs at other London/south-east airports potentially displaced by 2050
0.05%annual GDP impact of Heathrow expansion
60,000local jobs Heathrow expansion could bring
40%economic boost outside London and the south-east
£2.6bneconomic boost from Heathrow expansion
£150bnin trade benefits not captured by economic models
3,500-metrelength of planned runway
£33bnestimated cost of the third runway
756,000
annual flights with expansion
480,000current annual flights
2035target opening year for the third runway

Who's Involved

Department for Transport
Published analysis of government forecasts on Heathrow expansion
New Economics Foundation (NEF)
Published analysis suggesting job displacement from Heathrow expansion
Andy Burnham
Prime minister who has promised to rebalance infrastructure spending
Rachel Reeves
Previous chancellor and vocal champion of Heathrow expansion plans
Alex Chapman
Head of economic policy at the NEF
Thomas Woldbye
Heathrow chief executive
Ed Miliband
Foreign secretary and opponent of Heathrow expansion

↳ Why This Matters

The analysis raises significant questions about the equitable distribution of economic benefits from major infrastructure projects, potentially shifting investment and jobs away from regions that need them most and challenging the government's commitment to rebalancing the economy.

Key facts

  • An analysis of government forecasts indicates that expanding Heathrow Airport would result in job losses in other UK regions.
  • The West Midlands region could lose nearly 10,000 jobs, with Birmingham Airport projected to lose 7.5 million passengers annually by 2050.
  • The New Economics Foundation (NEF) estimates that by 2050, Heathrow expansion could lead to 15,200 aviation jobs and 6,400 jobs at other London/south-east airports being displaced.
  • Government modelling suggests the overall GDP impact of the expansion could be as low as 0.05% per year.
  • The government disputes these findings, stating that expansion would create over 60,000 local jobs and that 40% of the £2.6bn economic boost would be outside London and the south-east.
  • The planned third runway would cost an estimated £33bn and increase annual flights from 480,000 to 756,000.

An analysis of government forecasts suggests that expanding Heathrow Airport would lead to significant job losses in other regions of the UK, potentially costing the West Midlands nearly 10,000 jobs alone. The economic paper, published by the Department for Transport, indicates that airports in England and Wales could lose millions of passengers if Heathrow builds a third runway, impacting regional employment.

The New Economics Foundation (NEF) stated that the jobs created at Heathrow would largely represent those displaced from elsewhere. Their analysis of Department for Transport (DfT) modelling suggests that by 2050, 15,200 aviation jobs and 6,400 jobs at other London and south-east airports could be shifted to Heathrow. This finding could undermine political support for the expansion, especially given Prime Minister Andy Burnham's focus on rebalancing infrastructure spending away from the south of England.

While former chancellor Rachel Reeves had supported the expansion for economic growth, the impact report suggests the overall GDP boost could be minimal, up to 0.05% annually. A peer review of the DfT's GDP analysis also questioned claims of broad distribution of gains to the regions. Alex Chapman, head of economic policy at the NEF, criticized the plan as moving jobs and investment to London and the south-east, questioning its continuation given the evaporated GDP case and significant environmental damages.

The government, however, maintains that the NEF analysis is misleading and does not factor in the potential for over 60,000 local jobs created by the expansion. They assert that benefits will be felt nationwide, with up to 40% of the £2.6 billion economic boost expected outside London and the south-east. Heathrow's chief executive, Thomas Woldbye, added that economic models do not capture all benefits, such as £150 billion in trade and private investment in UK supply chains.

The current plan involves constructing a 3,500-meter runway over the M25 motorway at an estimated cost of £33 billion, increasing annual flights from 480,000 to 756,000. Ministers aim to open the runway by 2035. The expansion has faced opposition, including from Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband.

Frequently asked questions

Critics argue that expanding Heathrow Airport will primarily shift jobs and investment from other UK regions to London and the south-east, rather than creating new overall economic growth.

An analysis suggests the West Midlands could lose nearly 10,000 jobs, and by 2050, up to 15,200 aviation jobs and 6,400 jobs at other London/south-east airports could be displaced to Heathrow.

The government disputes the analysis, stating it is misleading and does not account for over 60,000 local jobs created by the expansion, with significant economic benefits expected nationwide.

Government modelling suggests the overall GDP impact could be as low as 0.05% per year, though Heathrow's chief executive claims current models do not capture all benefits, such as trade and private investment.

What Happens Next

01MPs must approve the Heathrow expansion national policy statement.
02The government aims to accelerate the building of Heathrow's third runway to open by 2035.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

An analysis suggests Heathrow expansion would shift thousands of jobs from other UK regions.
Birmingham airport alone could lose 9,500 jobs due to a projected decrease in passengers.
The New Economics Foundation (NEF) stated that jobs created at Heathrow would primarily be displaced from elsewhere in the country.
DfT modelling suggests 15,200 aviation jobs and 6,400 jobs at other London/south-east airports could move to Heathrow by 2050.
The government stated the NEF analysis focuses on a limited period and that expansion would bring nationwide benefits.
DfT modelling indicates the overall GDP impact of Heathrow expansion could be up to 0.05% per year.
A peer review of DfT's GDP analysis stated it would be erroneous to claim broad distribution of gains.
The NEF head of economic policy stated the runway plan appears to move jobs and investment to London and the south-east.

Sources

T1
Heathrow expansion would take thousands of jobs from other UK regions, report findsThe Guardian

Related Stories

UK journalists alter reporting due to safety fears, study finds
26 Jul · 5:06 AM
The one voice Hong Kong can’t ignore on ride-hailing? The public
26 Jul · 9:35 PM
Burnham Aware of Healey's £9bn Defence Spending Demand
26 Jul · 8:56 AM
US Chamber exec urges flexibility on Japan's $550bn investment pledge
26 Jul · 8:06 PM
NRC proposes dropping radiation safety rule amid Trump's nuclear power push
26 Jul · 1:06 PM