Key facts
- The FCC voted 3-0 to eliminate a rule requiring ISPs to itemize all discretionary monthly passthrough fees on broadband price labels.
The Federal Communications Commission voted to eliminate a rule requiring Internet service providers to list all "passthrough" fees individually on broadband price labels. ISPs can now aggregate these fees, making it harder for consumers to compare prices and understand total costs.

This FCC decision makes it harder for consumers to understand the true cost of internet service, potentially leading to bill shock and hindering their ability to compare plans accurately. The move benefits ISPs by reducing their compliance burden and allowing them to continue advertising lower initial prices.
The Federal Communications Commission has voted to eliminate a rule that mandated Internet service providers (ISPs) to list all their "passthrough" fees individually on broadband price labels. This decision reverses a 2023 update designed to prevent bill shock and aid consumer price comparisons.
ISPs had argued that listing every fee was burdensome and complex. In response, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr proposed allowing ISPs to display these fees in an aggregate "up to" amount or via links to provider-managed webpages. This change makes it more difficult for consumers to ascertain the total monthly cost of their internet service.
The final order, approved with a 3-0 vote including Democrat Anna Gomez, represents a compromise. While Gomez expressed a preference for full itemization, the updated labels will now provide descriptions of fees remitted to state/local governments and third parties, with links for consumers to find more detailed information. The new rules also permit customer service representatives to discuss label information conversationally over the phone, rather than reading it verbatim.
Passthrough fees, such as E911 or pole attachment fees, are costs that ISPs pass on to consumers rather than incorporating them into the base advertised price. The FCC's previous leadership had implemented broadband labels following a directive from Congress to ensure transparency. However, Carr argued that the previous rules resulted in cluttered labels that increased compliance costs for providers.