Key facts
- 18 Democratic-led states, Washington D.C., and New York City are suing the EPA.
- The lawsuit challenges a rule that extends deadlines for phasing out hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).
- HFCs are potent greenhouse gases used in commercial refrigeration.
- The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act aims for an 85% HFC reduction by 2036.
- The EPA stated the rule aims to lower costs for families and businesses.
Eighteen Democratic-led states, Washington D.C., and New York City have filed a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) challenging a new rule that relaxes deadlines for phasing out dangerous hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in commercial refrigeration equipment. The plaintiffs argue this decision will harm the climate and undermine the goals of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, which mandates an 85% reduction in HFCs by 2036.
The lawsuit, filed with the federal appeals court in Washington D.C., specifically targets a provision allowing supermarkets, convenience stores, and bakeries to continue using refrigerants with a significantly higher global warming potential until 2032. Critics, including California Attorney General Rob Bonta, contend that the rule prioritizes industry profits over public health and environmental well-being, reversing progress made in combating climate change.
The EPA, which has a policy of not commenting on pending litigation, stated in a regulatory filing that the rule is intended to reduce living costs by not forcing companies to adopt more expensive technologies. This deregulation effort aligns with President Donald Trump's broader agenda, including an executive order aimed at reducing regulatory burdens.
The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, signed by President Trump in December 2020, set a clear path for HFC phasedown. The challenged rule was scheduled to take effect on July 27.