Key facts
- A federal judge ruled that United Airlines must face a lawsuit from passengers who paid for window seats but found they had no actual windows.
- The judge rejected United's argument that 'window seat' referred only to the seat's location next to the cabin wall.
- Passengers claimed the airline failed to clearly disclose the absence of windows during the booking process.
- The lawsuits, filed by passengers on Boeing 737, Boeing 757, and Airbus A321 planes, seek millions in damages.
- Delta Air Lines is also facing a similar lawsuit in a Brooklyn federal court.
U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco has ruled that United Airlines must face a class-action lawsuit brought by passengers who paid for window seats but discovered their seats lacked actual windows. The judge rejected the airline's defense that 'window' merely indicated a seat's position relative to the cabin wall and aisle, and that no contractual promise of an outside view was made.