All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

Treasury accused of seeking to cap motor finance payouts

Created at 1 Sep · 8:10 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Court filings allege the Treasury sought to limit payouts in the motor finance scandal to levels manageable for lenders, while the FCA is accused of unlawfully failing to protect consumers. Consumer advocacy group Consumer Voice is challenging the redress scheme.

Key Numbers

£9.1bnmotor finance compensation scheme value
February 2025Court rejected Treasury intervention
£7.5bnestimated consumer payouts
£2bnLloyds Banking Group provisions
£640mSantander provisions
£830average payout for motorists
February 2027latest hearing for challenges

Who's Involved

Treasury
accused of seeking to cap motor finance payouts
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
accused of unlawfully failing to protect consumers
Consumer Voice
advocacy group challenging the redress scheme
Courmacs Legal
law firm partnering with Consumer Voice
Rachel Reeves
former Chancellor who attempted to intervene in a Supreme Court case
Volkswagen Financial Services
challenging the FCA's redress scheme
Mercedes Benz Financial Services
challenging the FCA's redress scheme
Crédit Agricole Auto Finance
challenging the FCA's redress scheme
Lloyds Banking Group
set aside £2bn in provisions
Santander
raised provisions to £640m
Treasury accused of seeking to cap motor finance payouts

↳ Why This Matters

The allegations raise significant questions about the integrity of the motor finance redress scheme and the FCA's role in protecting consumers versus its engagement with financial institutions, potentially impacting billions in compensation and the future of consumer finance regulation.

Key facts

  • The Treasury is accused of seeking to cap payouts in the motor finance scandal to levels manageable for lenders.
  • The FCA is accused of unlawfully failing to protect consumers in the motor finance redress scheme.
  • Consumer Voice and Courmacs Legal are challenging the £9.1bn compensation scheme.
  • The Supreme Court found one customer's undisclosed commission created an 'unfair relationship'.
  • Several financial services firms and banks are facing billions in payouts.
  • The FCA has suspended parts of the redress program.

The UK Treasury is facing accusations that it sought to limit payouts in the motor finance scandal to a level that lenders could absorb, with a consumer advocacy group claiming the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) acted unlawfully by not adequately protecting consumers. Consumer Voice, in conjunction with law firm Courmacs Legal, is seeking to overhaul the £9.1bn compensation scheme, alleging that internal documents show the Treasury influenced the FCA's decisions.

New court filings reveal that Consumer Voice contends the FCA received 'HMT steer' to ensure redress payments were manageable for lenders. This comes after former Chancellor Rachel Reeves' attempt to intervene in a Supreme Court case due to perceived negative economic consequences, an intervention the court rejected. The Supreme Court had previously ruled that while hidden commissions were not automatically unlawful, one customer's undisclosed commission created an 'unfair relationship', potentially opening the door for an industry-wide redress scheme.

Several financial institutions, including Volkswagen Financial Services, Mercedes Benz Financial Services, and Crédit Agricole Auto Finance, are challenging the FCA's scheme, arguing it unfairly assumes all customers suffered a loss if commissions were undisclosed. Major banks like Lloyds Banking Group and Santander have set aside billions for potential payouts but are not directly challenging the scheme. The FCA has suspended parts of the program, which anticipates an average payout of £830 per motorist, as it faces multiple challenges, with the Upper Tribunal set to hear four cases, including Consumer Voice's, by February 2027.

Frequently asked questions

The motor finance scandal concerns allegations of undisclosed commissions in car finance deals, leading to claims that consumers were charged unfairly.

Consumer advocacy group Consumer Voice, alongside law firm Courmacs Legal, is challenging the scheme. Additionally, financial firms like Volkswagen Financial Services, Mercedes Benz Financial Services, and Crédit Agricole Auto Finance are also bringing cases.

Court filings claim the Treasury sought to cap payouts at a level manageable for lenders and influenced the FCA's decisions on the redress scheme.

The Supreme Court ruled that hidden commissions were not automatically unlawful but found one instance of an undisclosed commission created an 'unfair relationship'.

What Happens Next

01The Upper Tribunal is scheduled to hear four challenges to the FCA's redress scheme, including Consumer Voice's, by February 2027.

How It Developed

Consumer Voice and Courmacs Legal launched a bid to overhaul the motor finance redress scheme.
Court filings revealed the FCA consulted with the Treasury on the scheme's design.
Former Chancellor Rachel Reeves attempted to intervene in a Supreme Court case due to economic concerns.
The Supreme Court partially overturned a ruling on car finance deals, finding one undisclosed commission created an unfair relationship.
Volkswagen Financial Services, Mercedes Benz Financial Services, and Crédit Agricole Auto Finance are challenging the scheme.
Lloyds Banking Group and Santander have set aside billions for payouts but are not challenging the scheme.
The FCA has suspended parts of the program amid challenges.
The FCA stated it made independent decisions on motor finance and consulted openly with the Treasury.

Sources

T1
Treasury sought to cap motor finance payouts, court filings claimCity AM

Related Stories

FCA boss accused of threatening consumer group over car loan scheme
1 Sep · 7:26 AM
UK financial watchdog reviews child trust funds worth £1.5bn
1 Sep · 4:11 AM
Australian judge may order Tesla access to engineering systems in class action
1 Sep · 2:12 AM
FCA to tighten rules on bullying and harassment in City firms
1 Sep · 5:06 AM
John Healey seeks budget ideas from all Treasury staff
1 Sep · 4:11 AM