Key facts
- The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill aims to allow terminally ill adults over 18, with a prognosis of six months or less, to be assisted in ending their life.
- The bill was previously blocked in the House of Lords due to extensive amendments and time constraints.
- MP Lauren Edwards is considering using the Parliament Act to bypass the Lords' objections if the bill is reintroduced.
- The Parliament Act allows a bill to pass without the Lords' consent if it is approved identically by the House of Commons in two successive parliamentary sessions.
- Concerns have been raised by various groups, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists and disability charities, regarding the bill's safeguards and potential impact.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which would permit adults over 18 with a prognosis of six months or less to seek assistance in ending their life, is facing renewed parliamentary debate. MP Lauren Edwards is considering employing the Parliament Act, a rarely used legislative tool, to overcome potential objections from the House of Lords, which previously blocked the bill. This act allows a bill to become law if it is passed identically by the House of Commons in two consecutive parliamentary sessions, effectively bypassing the Lords' veto.
Edwards stated she is adhering to parliamentary rules and urged the House of Lords to 'finish the job' by refining the legislation, indicating openness to sensible amendments. However, some MPs, including Labour's Ashley Dalton, have expressed deep concern, labeling the bill divisive and flawed, and warning it could grant unchecked powers over life and death decisions. They argue that parliamentary time should be focused on issues like the cost of living and the NHS.
Prominent supporters of the bill, such as former ministers Louise Haigh and Jeremy Hunt, have indicated they would not support invoking the Parliament Act to force the bill through, citing ethical concerns and the unlikelihood of its success. Ian Murray, another former minister, stated he would continue to monitor the bill's progress and assess it based on its merits, safeguards, and constituent views. The government has officially remained neutral, though some cabinet members have voiced opposition. The previous attempt to pass the bill narrowly passed the House of Commons in June 2025.