A former Israeli negotiator stated Israel is "existentially dependent on US aid" amid ongoing debate over a US-Iran ceasefire agreement. While both sides appear to agree the ceasefire extends to Lebanon, Israel indicated it will not withdraw from security zones.
The ongoing reliance on US support and the differing interpretations of the US-Iran ceasefire agreement highlight the complex geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East and the potential for continued instability in the region.
A former Israeli negotiator has stated that Israel is "existentially dependent on US aid," as discussions continue regarding a US-Iran ceasefire agreement. While both Washington and Tehran appear to agree that the ceasefire will extend to Lebanon, significant differences exist in its interpretation and implementation.
Israeli officials have indicated their intention to remain in what they term "security zones" within Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza. This stance has drawn criticism from some Israeli commentators, with headlines in Israeli media reportedly describing the agreement as an "abject failure."
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared a "historic victory" over Iran and stated that Israel's forces would remain in Lebanon "for as long as necessary." He claimed the joint US-Israeli military campaign had prevented "nuclear annihilation" for Israel. However, US officials have sought to reassure Israel, stating that the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon is not a condition of the pact between the US and Iran, and that Israel retains the right to self-defense against Hezbollah.
Despite the preliminary agreement, sporadic violence persisted in southern Lebanon. Hezbollah welcomed the deal, linking its adherence to a comprehensive ceasefire to Israel's compliance. The situation highlights ongoing tensions, with analysts noting a widening gulf between President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu, and a shift in some American public opinion viewing Israel as "Goliath" rather than "David."