Key facts
- The Trump administration ordered Anthropic to take its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models offline.
- The order cited national security concerns and a requirement to prevent use by foreign nationals.
The Trump administration has compelled AI firm Anthropic to take its two newest models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline due to unspecified national security concerns. The move follows reports of Amazon researchers bypassing Fable 5's guardrails, raising questions about AI policy and potential benefits for competitors.

The action against Anthropic highlights the complex regulatory landscape for advanced AI, raising questions about national security, digital sovereignty, and the potential for government intervention to impact the competitive dynamics within the AI industry.
The Trump administration has ordered AI company Anthropic to pull its two newest models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline, citing unspecified national security concerns. The directive requires that the models not be used by any foreign nationals, a condition Anthropic stated it could not meet, leading to the complete removal of the models.
Reports indicate the White House was prompted to act after Amazon researchers allegedly discovered a method to bypass Fable 5's safety guardrails. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy reportedly communicated these concerns to the administration, which then issued the order.
The move has sparked debate among cybersecurity experts, with many signing an open letter to President Trump to revoke the order. They argue that removing advanced cybersecurity capabilities from network defenders in the U.S. is dangerous. Some analysts suggest the action may be retaliatory, stemming from a strained relationship between Anthropic and the administration, and could potentially benefit competitors by slowing Anthropic's progress.
Conversely, there is speculation that this scrutiny could paradoxically enhance Anthropic's reputation, portraying its models as exceptionally powerful and even attracting users who are drawn to the "bad boy" image of a company facing government opposition. This situation mirrors broader discussions about AI safety and the public perception of powerful AI technologies.