Judge blocks DOJ from obtaining transgender care records from NY hospitals
window 24h
IN SHORT
A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from accessing sensitive medical records from New York City healthcare institutions that provided gender identity care to minors. The judge cited the government's broad request as unconstitutional. Separately, three International Criminal Court judges are suing President Donald Trump and his administration over sanctions imposed last year, arguing they were unlawful and exceeded statutory authority. Meanwhile, a federal judge dismissed a Department of Justice lawsuit against four New Jersey cities regarding immigration cooperation, citing a statewide directive that rendered the case moot. Additionally, a U.S. appeals court rejected a Trump administration bid to access Michigan's voter rolls, ruling the Civil Rights Act of 1960 does not grant such access.
✉Newsletter
PiQ Daily
Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.
Who's Involved
Trump administration
sued over sanctions and seeking access to records and voter rolls
US District Judge Katherine Polk Failla
issued a temporary restraining order blocking access to transgender care records
International Criminal Court judges
suing President Donald Trump over sanctions
President Donald Trump
named in a lawsuit by ICC judges over sanctions
Department of Justice
involved in lawsuits against NJ cities and seeking access to voter rolls
U.S. appeals court
rejected Trump administration bid to access Michigan voter rolls
1 / 2
Key facts
A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from obtaining transgender care records from NY hospitals.
US District Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued a temporary restraining order.
The judge cited the government's broad request for sensitive medical information as unconstitutional.
Three International Criminal Court judges are suing President Donald Trump and his administration.
The lawsuit claims sanctions imposed on the ICC judges were unlawful and exceeded statutory authority.
A federal judge dismissed a DOJ lawsuit against four New Jersey cities over immigration cooperation.
The judge found the case moot due to a statewide directive.
A U.S. appeals court rejected a Trump administration bid to access Michigan voter rolls.
The court ruled the Civil Rights Act of 1960 does not grant the federal government access to state voter lists.
A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from obtaining sensitive medical records from New York City healthcare institutions that provided gender identity care to minors. US District Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued a temporary restraining order, stating that the government's broad request for sensitive medical information was unconstitutional. The order halts the Justice Department's efforts to access these records.
In a separate legal challenge, three International Criminal Court (ICC) judges have filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump and his administration. They argue that sanctions imposed on them last year were unlawful and constituted extrajudicial pressure. The judges contend that these sanctions exceed the scope of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Furthermore, a federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit initiated by the Department of Justice against four New Jersey cities. The lawsuit concerned local policies that limited cooperation with federal immigration agents. The judge ruled that a statewide directive had rendered these local policies moot, finding a fundamental flaw in the federal government's approach of treating local policies in isolation.
Separately, a U.S. appeals court has upheld a block on the Justice Department's attempt to obtain Michigan's voter rolls. The court ruled that the Civil Rights Act of 1960 does not grant the federal government the authority to demand state-compiled voter lists.
↳ Why This Matters
A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from obtaining sensitive medical records from New York City healthcare institutions that provided gender identity care to minors. US District Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued a temporary restraining order, stating that the government's broad request for sensitive medical information was unconstitutional. The order halts the Justice Department's efforts to access these records.
Frequently asked questions
US District Judge Katherine Polk Failla temporarily blocked the Trump administration from obtaining sensitive medical records from New York City healthcare institutions that provided gender identity care to minors.
The judge cited the broad scope of the government's request for sensitive medical information as unconstitutional and an improper effort to 'demonize and eradicate an entire population of transgender' people, stating the government's interest did not outweigh the plaintiffs' privacy interests.
The Justice Department is conducting a nationwide criminal investigation into the provision of gender identity care, reportedly probing potential 'misbranding' of drugs approved by the FDA.
NYU Langone Hospitals was specifically mentioned as having received a federal grand jury subpoena, and the ruling applies to healthcare institutions in New York City that provided gender identity care to minors.
What Happens Next
01The judge will determine if the temporary restraining order will be made permanent.
02The Justice Department may appeal the ruling.
Get the newsletter.
Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.