All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

UK Supreme Court rules Bahrain cannot claim state immunity in surveillance case

Created at 27 Jul · 3:21 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The UK Supreme Court has dismissed Bahrain's appeal for state immunity in a hacking case, allowing a lawsuit by two Bahraini dissidents to proceed. The dissidents allege their laptops were targeted by spyware installed by Bahrain in 2011, leading to claims of psychiatric harm.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

2020year lawsuit launched
2011year spyware allegedly installed
3 to 2majority ruling

Who's Involved

UK Supreme Court
ruled against Bahrain's claim of state immunity
Bahrain
kingdom appealing state immunity in surveillance case
Saeed Shehabi
Bahraini dissident suing kingdom for surveillance
Moosa Mohammed
Bahraini dissident suing kingdom for surveillance
UK Supreme Court rules Bahrain cannot claim state immunity in surveillance case

↳ Why This Matters

This ruling sets a precedent that authoritarian states may not be able to claim immunity in UK courts for alleged human rights abuses conducted on British soil, potentially opening the door for further legal challenges against state-sponsored surveillance.

Key facts

  • The UK Supreme Court ruled that Bahrain cannot claim state immunity in a surveillance case.
  • The ruling allows a lawsuit by two Bahraini dissidents, Saeed Shehabi and Moosa Mohammed, to proceed.
  • The dissidents allege their laptops were targeted by spyware installed by Bahrain in 2011.
  • The court stated the case can proceed because the surveillance occurred on British soil.
  • The UK Supreme Court has ruled that Bahrain cannot claim state immunity in a case brought by two pro-democracy dissidents who allege their laptops were targeted with spyware. The dissidents, Saeed Shehabi and Moosa Mohammed, launched their lawsuit in London's High Court in 2020, seeking damages for psychiatric harm, claiming that spyware installed by Bahrain in 2011 allowed the kingdom to monitor their activities and those of other critics.

    In a three-to-two majority decision, the Supreme Court dismissed Bahrain's appeal for state immunity, stating that the case could proceed because the alleged surveillance took place on British soil. Shehabi, who has lived in exile for decades, described the ruling as a victory for those targeted by authoritarian states beyond their borders.

    Bahrain has denied the charges. Mohammed also praised the decision, dedicating the victory to those suffering abuse in Bahrain's prisons and expressing hope for accountability.

    Frequently asked questions

    The UK Supreme Court ruled that Bahrain cannot claim state immunity in a case brought by two dissidents alleging surveillance.

    The claimants are Saeed Shehabi and Moosa Mohammed, two Bahraini pro-democracy dissidents living in the UK.

    They allege that their laptops were targeted with spyware installed by Bahrain in 2011, allowing the kingdom to monitor their activities and those of other critics.

    The ruling signifies that authoritarian states may not be able to claim immunity in UK courts for alleged human rights abuses conducted on British soil.

    What Happens Next

    01The lawsuit will proceed at London's High Court.
    02Bahrain may face further legal proceedings regarding the surveillance allegations.

    Get the newsletter.

    Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

    Cadence

    How It Developed

    Two Bahraini dissidents launched a lawsuit in London's High Court in 2020.
    The dissidents allege their laptops were targeted by spyware installed by Bahrain in 2011.
    The UK Supreme Court dismissed Bahrain's appeal for state immunity by a three-to-two majority.
    The court ruled the case can proceed because the surveillance took place on British soil.

    Sources

    T1
    UK Supreme Court says no state immunity for Bahrain in surveillance caseMiddle East Eye

    Related Stories

    India activists challenge Modi govt over AI surveillance at youth protest
    27 Jul · 1:41 PM
    Arabic banned at work for Palestinian citizens of Israel
    27 Jul · 11:06 AM
    Protesters challenge Queensland ban on 'from the river to the sea' slogan
    27 Jul · 7:11 AM
    Malaysia detains over 100 Rohingya refugees seeking shelter at UNHCR
    27 Jul · 1:06 AM
    Special counsel seeks 7-year prison term for ex-spy chief in perjury appellate trial
    27 Jul · 10:16 AM