All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

UK breast cancer screening misses 95% of at-risk women under 50, study finds

Created at 4 Aug · 3:55 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

UK breast cancer screening guidelines are too narrow, missing up to 95% of women under 50 at higher risk, according to a new study. Researchers suggest a multifactorial risk assessment tool could identify more at-risk individuals.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

95%of women under 50 at higher risk missed by current screening
5-10%of breast cancer cases linked to inherited genes
96%of cases in women over 40
25%of cases in women over 75
420new male breast cancer cases annually in the UK
35age for GPs to consider oral contraceptive or HRT use
26.5%estimated proportion of women under 50 at above-average risk with Boadicea
34.8%estimated proportion of women under 50 developing breast cancer within 10 years
1.4%proportion of women under 50 referred under current Nice criteria
4.4%proportion of women who develop breast cancer referred under current Nice criter
73%of women under 50 with breast cancer have no family history

Who's Involved

National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice)
Set current UK guidelines for breast cancer screening
Cambridge University
Co-led the study on predicting breast cancer risk
Institute of Cancer Research
Co-led the study on predicting breast cancer risk
Dr Juliet Usher-Smith
Lead researcher recommending NHS review of screening criteria
Cancer Research UK
Funded the study and commented on accessibility and equity of changes
NHS
National Health Service, which implements screening programmes

↳ Why This Matters

The study highlights a potential gap in current UK breast cancer screening protocols for women under 50, suggesting that a significant number of individuals at higher risk may not be identified due to a narrow focus on genetic factors. This could lead to delayed diagnoses and potentially poorer outcomes for a vulnerable population.

Key facts

  • UK breast cancer screening guidelines are missing up to 95% of women under 50 who are at higher risk.
  • Current guidelines by Nice focus only on inherited genes, excluding lifestyle and other risk factors.
  • A study using the Boadicea risk assessment tool identified significantly more at-risk women under 50.
  • The Boadicea tool combines family history, lifestyle, reproductive history, and genetic information.
  • Researchers estimate 26.5% of women under 50 would be categorized as above-average risk with the new tool.
  • A key reason for missed cases is that 73% of women under 50 with breast cancer have no family history.

Current guidelines in the UK for breast cancer screening for women under 50 are considered too restrictive, potentially missing a significant majority of those at higher risk, according to a study published in the British Journal of Cancer. Researchers from Cambridge University and the Institute of Cancer Research found that the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice) guidelines focus predominantly on inherited genetic factors, overlooking crucial lifestyle and reproductive history elements that contribute to breast cancer risk in younger women.

The study utilized a new risk assessment tool called Boadicea, which integrates a broader range of factors including family history, lifestyle choices, reproductive patterns, and genetic information to generate a risk score. The researchers estimate that if all women under 50 were assessed with Boadicea, approximately 26.5% would be identified as being at above-average risk and warranting further investigation. This is a stark contrast to the current Nice criteria, which would only refer about 1.4% of women in this age group for additional assessment.

A significant finding highlighted by the study is that three-quarters of women under 50 who develop breast cancer within a decade have no prior family history of the disease, underscoring the limitations of the current screening approach. Lead researcher Dr Juliet Usher-Smith suggested that the NHS should re-evaluate its screening criteria in light of these findings. However, she acknowledged that expanding screening could increase workloads and potentially cause unnecessary anxiety for some women.

Dr Sowmiya Moorthie from Cancer Research UK, which funded the research, emphasized the need for any potential changes to be accessible and equitable, while also considering the psychological impact of increased referrals. Nice stated that while they welcome the findings and recognize the potential of multifactorial risk assessment tools, the current evidence does not yet support a change to their existing breast cancer guidelines. The NHS breast cancer screening program is subject to regular evaluation by the UK National Screening Committee, and all women are encouraged to be aware of any changes in their breasts and consult a doctor if they notice anything unusual.

Frequently asked questions

Current guidelines from Nice focus primarily on inherited genes. Women under 50 are generally not offered routine mammogram scans unless they have a strong family history of breast cancer.

Boadicea is a new risk calculator that combines factors such as family history, lifestyle, reproductive history, and genetic information to provide a breast cancer risk score.

Researchers estimate that if all women under 50 were assessed with Boadicea, about a quarter (26.5%) would be categorized as at above-average risk.

The study found that three-quarters of women under 50 who develop breast cancer within a decade have no family history of the disease, indicating that other factors are significant.

What Happens Next

01Nice will review the study's findings in light of ongoing evaluations of the NHS breast cancer screening programme.
02Further research may be conducted to validate the Boadicea tool and its impact on clinical practice.
03The NHS National Screening Committee will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of current screening guidelines.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

A study found UK breast cancer screening guidelines miss up to 95% of women under 50 at higher risk.
Current National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice) guidelines focus solely on inherited genes, not lifestyle factors.
A new risk assessment tool, Boadicea, combines family history, lifestyle, reproductive history, and genetic information.
Researchers estimate that using Boadicea could identify 26.5% of women under 50 as at above-average risk.
This contrasts with current Nice criteria, which would refer only 1.4% of women under 50 for further assessment.
Three-quarters of women under 50 who develop breast cancer within a decade have no family history of the disease.
Lead researcher Dr Juliet Usher-Smith suggested the NHS should review current criteria.
Cancer Research UK noted that any changes must be accessible, equitable, and consider potential anxiety from extra referrals.

Sources

T1
Breast cancer checks missing most women under 50 who are at risk, says UK studyBBC News

Related Stories

Child vaccination rates fall due to access, not social media, experts say
3 Aug · 11:36 PM
Apple challenges UK government data access demand in new legal filing
3 Aug · 5:46 PM
PM halts early prisoner release scheme amid overcrowding concerns
4 Aug · 1:06 AM
NHS mental health trust plans £25m in cuts to jobs and services
3 Aug · 5:11 AM
Author claims missing chapter from Democrat election autopsy report discussed officials' wealth
3 Aug · 5:40 PM