HomeAll NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Texas court reverses order shuttering clinics, citing lack of evidence against midwife

Created at 23 Jul · 7:14 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

A Texas appeals court ruled that the state lacked evidence to support claims that a Houston midwife violated the state's abortion ban. The court reversed an order that would have closed three clinics managed by the midwife, Maria Rojas.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

March 2025Rojas arrested

Who's Involved

Maria Rojas
Houston midwife charged with violating Texas' abortion ban
Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals
State appeals court that reversed the clinic closure order
Ken Paxton
Texas Attorney General whose office filed the civil lawsuit
Jenna Hudson
Representative for Rojas from the Center for Reproductive Rights
Scott Field
Justice who wrote the appeals court opinion

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling represents a significant legal setback for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's efforts to enforce the state's abortion ban through civil litigation, potentially impacting future attempts to prosecute healthcare providers and close clinics based on similar evidence.

Key facts

  • A Texas appeals court found no evidence to support claims that midwife Maria Rojas violated the state's criminal abortion ban.
  • The court reversed a lower court's order to close three clinics managed by Rojas.
  • The ruling stated that evidence from Rojas' criminal case should not have been used in the civil lawsuit.
  • Maria Rojas is still facing felony charges for allegedly performing abortions and practicing medicine without a license.
  • A Texas state appeals court on Thursday ruled that the state attorney general had no evidence to support claims that a Houston midwife, Maria Rojas, had performed illegal abortions, reversing an order that would have shuttered three clinics she managed. The Austin-based Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals stated that a state judge had improperly relied on evidence from a related criminal prosecution against Rojas in the separate civil case. Rojas is still facing felony charges for violating Texas' near-total ban on abortion, but the appeals court ruling is a setback for the civil lawsuit filed by Attorney General Ken Paxton's office seeking money damages and to prevent Rojas from practicing. The court determined that a filing in her criminal case establishing probable cause for arrest should not have been admitted in the civil case. Justice Scott Field wrote for the three-judge panel that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the temporary injunctive relief. Paxton's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Jenna Hudson of the Center for Reproductive Rights, representing Rojas, stated that despite the legal victory, it will be nearly impossible for Rojas to re-open the clinics. Hudson criticized the state for shutting down needed healthcare providers based on "trumped-up evidence and a shoddy investigation." Rojas, who has pleaded not guilty, was arrested in March 2025 and charged with performing abortions and practicing medicine without a license. Paxton's office claims Rojas employed other midwives at her clinics who falsely presented themselves as licensed medical professionals. Eight other individuals who worked at Rojas' clinics were arrested in October. These cases are part of a broader legal battle over abortion rights following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

    Frequently asked questions

    The Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals ruled that the state attorney general lacked sufficient evidence to support claims that midwife Maria Rojas violated the state's abortion ban and reversed an order to close her clinics.

    Maria Rojas is facing felony charges for allegedly performing abortions and practicing medicine without a license, and has pleaded not guilty.

    The state attorney general's office claimed Rojas employed other midwives who falsely presented themselves as licensed medical professionals to provide treatment.

    The ruling is a setback for the state's civil case against Rojas and highlights issues with the evidence used to support claims of violating the abortion ban.

    What Happens Next

    01Maria Rojas' criminal case will proceed.
    02The state attorney general's office may seek to re-file the civil case with different evidence.

    Get the newsletter.

    Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

    Cadence

    How It Developed

    A Texas state appeals court ruled the state attorney general lacked evidence to support claims against midwife Maria Rojas.
    The court reversed an order that would have shuttered three clinics managed by Rojas.
    The appeals court stated a state judge improperly relied on evidence from a criminal case in a separate civil lawsuit.
    Rojas is still facing felony charges related to violating Texas' abortion ban.
    Sponsored

    London Quick Take - 22 July - UK inflation softens, oil rises and chips rally ahead of Alphabet, Tesla earnings

    SAXO

    Sources

    T1
    Texas court says state's lawsuit claiming midwife violated abortion ban lacks evidenceReuters

    Related Stories

    US judge questions 69,000 claims linking J&J talc to cancer
    22 Jul · 8:39 PM
    South Korean woman acquitted of murdering newborn after hospital delivery
    23 Jul · 10:26 AM
    ICE shooting: Passengers dispute official account of Texas incident
    22 Jul · 11:11 PM
    Hernandez to seek dismissal of Honduran charges after Trump pardon
    22 Jul · 8:58 PM
    Government withdraws subpoenas of NYT reporters over Trump plane reporting
    23 Jul · 10:10 AM