HomeEverythingEducation
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Meta appeals landmark jury verdict finding it liable for teen social media addiction

Created at 11 Jul · 12:33 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, has appealed a Los Angeles jury's verdict that found its platforms designed to hook young users, leading to social media addiction and worsened mental health struggles. The company plans to argue its case in subsequent court filings.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

$3 milliondamages awarded to plaintiff
$3 millionrecommended punitive damages
20-year-oldplaintiff's age
1996year of Communications Decency Act

Who's Involved

Meta
parent company of Instagram and Facebook, appealing verdict
Google
owner of YouTube, also found negligent and appealing
Kaley
plaintiff in the social media addiction lawsuit
Mark Lanier
lead attorney for the plaintiff
Carolyn B. Kuhl
trial judge who denied post-trial motions

↳ Why This Matters

This appeal challenges a significant jury verdict that could set a precedent for how social media companies are held accountable for the impact of their platform designs on young users' mental health and well-being.

Key facts

  • Meta has appealed a jury verdict that found its social media platforms liable for causing social media addiction in young users.
  • The lawsuit centered on a 20-year-old woman who claimed addiction to social media worsened her mental health.
  • A jury awarded the plaintiff $3 million in damages and recommended an additional $3 million in punitive damages.
  • The jury found negligence by both Meta and Google-owned YouTube to be a substantial factor in causing harm.
  • Plaintiffs focused on platform design features like 'infinite scroll' and autoplay to circumvent Section 230 protections.
  • Meta and Google's post-trial motions to overturn the verdict were denied by the trial judge.

Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, has appealed a landmark jury verdict in Los Angeles that found the company liable for designing its platforms to foster social media addiction among young users. The appeal follows a jury's determination that Meta's negligence was a substantial factor in causing harm to a 20-year-old woman, identified as Kaley, whose mental health struggles were exacerbated by her childhood social media use.

The jury awarded Kaley $3 million in damages and recommended an additional $3 million in punitive damages. YouTube, owned by Google, was also found negligent in the case. Both Meta and Google have filed notices of appeal, with their legal arguments to be detailed in subsequent court filings. The companies had previously sought to have the verdict overturned or a new trial granted, but these motions were denied by the trial judge in early June.

Plaintiffs in such cases often focus on platform design features, like infinite scroll and autoplay, to circumvent legal protections afforded to tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields them from liability for third-party content. Meta and Google are expected to continue defending their practices vigorously, with Meta asserting that teen mental health is a complex issue not solely attributable to social media apps. This verdict could influence thousands of similar lawsuits against social media companies.

Frequently asked questions

The jury found Meta and Google negligent for causing social media addiction and worsening mental health struggles in a young user, awarding $3 million in damages and recommending an additional $3 million in punitive damages.

Meta is appealing the verdict, challenging the jury's determination that the company designed its platforms to hook young users without concern for their well-being.

Plaintiffs focus on platform design features, such as 'infinite scroll' and autoplay functions, to argue that the companies are responsible for the harm caused by their product design, rather than user-generated content.

What Happens Next

01Meta and Google will file detailed arguments for their appeals.
02The appellate court will review the case and issue a decision on the verdict.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

A jury found Meta and Google negligent for social media addiction harming a young user.
The jury awarded the plaintiff $3 million in damages and recommended an additional $3 million in punitive damages.
Meta and Google filed post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which were denied.
Meta and Google have filed notices of appeal for the verdict.
A Meta spokesperson stated that teen mental health is complex and cannot be linked to a single app.
Google stated that YouTube plans to appeal the verdict.

Sources

T1
Meta appeals landmark jury verdict that found it to blame for social media addiction for young usersAP News

Related Stories

California cannot seek damages from 23andMe successor over 2023 data breach
10 Jul · 10:22 PM
New York Times countersues US employment agency over diversity lawsuit
10 Jul · 8:16 PM
Carmakers broadly win first round in UK diesel emissions lawsuits
10 Jul · 2:38 PM
Plaintiffs oppose Veterans United motion to dismiss RESPA class-action suit
10 Jul · 7:51 PM
New York City proposes ban on deceptive subscription and junk fees
10 Jul · 11:10 AM