HomeEverythingEducation
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

New York City proposes ban on deceptive subscription and junk fees

Created at 10 Jul · 11:10 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

New York City is proposing new rules to ban deceptive subscription practices and "junk fees." The measures aim to require companies to advertise total prices upfront and simplify cancellation processes for recurring charges, with significant fines for violations.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

$525fine per user subscription for deceptive practices
70%New York City residents who rent
$162.5mannual savings for New Yorkers from subscription rule
40 yearsof deceptive pricing cited by commissioner

Who's Involved

Samuel AA Levine
New York City Commissioner of Consumer and Worker Protection
Zohran Mamdani
Official leading the city's affordability initiatives
Roosevelt Institute
Thinktank estimating annual savings from subscription rule
US Chamber of Commerce
Argued against a similar federal junk fee rule
Donald Trump
His FTC plans to pass a similar rule to Biden's struck-down one

↳ Why This Matters

These proposed regulations aim to increase transparency in pricing and simplify cancellation processes, potentially saving consumers millions annually and fostering fairer competition by preventing companies from hiding costs or making it difficult to opt out of services.

Key facts

  • New York City is proposing a ban on deceptive subscription practices, requiring simple cancellation methods.
  • A separate proposed rule mandates that sellers advertise the total price of goods and services upfront, including all mandatory fees.
  • Companies failing to offer easy cancellation could face fines of $525 per user subscription, plus back fees and additional penalties.
  • The proposed rules aim to combat predatory corporate practices and address affordability issues.
  • The city expects to finalize the junk fee rule by the end of the year after public comment and hearings.

New York City is moving to implement new regulations aimed at curbing deceptive business practices, including a ban on misleading subscription services and a requirement for upfront pricing of all fees. The proposed rules, spearheaded by city officials Samuel AA Levine and Zohran Mamdani, seek to protect consumers from being trapped into unwanted recurring charges and hidden costs.

The new measures would penalize companies that do not provide straightforward cancellation processes for subscriptions, with potential fines of $525 per user, alongside back fees and other penalties. This initiative targets services like gym memberships and streaming platforms, aiming to simplify the often arduous process of canceling.

Additionally, the city is proposing a rule to combat "junk fees" by requiring sellers to advertise the total price of any good or service upfront. This could significantly impact sectors like the housing market, where renters face numerous add-on charges not initially disclosed. Commissioner Levine stated that current practices incentivize companies to hide true prices rather than compete on value.

These efforts are framed as a response to decades of deregulation, with Levine referencing a shift away from government oversight that began in the Reagan era. While consumer protection measures like these are generally popular, they often face strong opposition from industry groups. For instance, a federal junk fee rule was weakened after lobbying, and a national "click-to-cancel" rule was recently struck down by a judge.

The subscription rule alone is estimated to save New Yorkers as much as $162.5 million annually. The proposed junk fee rule would also affect businesses catering to tourists, such as hotels and rental car agencies. The city is also exploring a ban on "surveillance pricing," where prices vary based on consumer data. Public comment and hearings are scheduled for the junk fee rule, with a goal for implementation by year-end.

Frequently asked questions

The proposed rule would ban companies from using deceptive tactics to enroll customers in subscriptions and would require them to provide a simple way to cancel recurring charges.

Junk fees are mandatory additional charges and fees that increase the final price of a good or service beyond the advertised price, such as hidden charges for apartments or events.

Companies that do not provide a simple way to cancel could face fines of $525 per user subscription, back fees, and additional penalties.

The city hopes to get the junk fee rule finalized by the end of the year, following public comment and a hearing.

What Happens Next

01The city will take public comments on the junk fee rule.
02A hearing will be held for the junk fee rule.
03The city hopes to finalize the junk fee rule by the end of the year.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

New York City proposed a rule to ban deceptive subscription practices.
The city also proposed a rule requiring upfront advertising of total prices for goods and services.
Violators of the subscription rule could face fines of $525 per user subscription.
The proposed junk fee rule would impact various sectors, including the housing market.
The measures are part of an effort by Zohran Mamdani and Samuel AA Levine to curb predatory corporate practices.
Industry groups have historically fought against such bans, citing concerns about business micromanagement.
A similar federal "click-to-cancel" rule was struck down, though Donald Trump's FTC plans a similar rule.
The subscription rule could save New Yorkers an estimated $162.5 million annually.

Sources

T1
New York City seeks to implement ban on deceptive subscription practicesThe Guardian

Related Stories

New York Sues 3M, DuPont Over 'Forever Chemicals'
9 Jul · 3:41 PM
Ofcom proposes new rules for tech platforms on scam ads
10 Jul · 11:55 AM
Wall Street Firms Restrict Trading on Prediction Markets
10 Jul · 11:45 AM
DOJ sues Maryland over 'sanctuary' policies interfering with immigration crackdown
9 Jul · 10:15 PM
iHeartMedia resolves FCC probe into alleged airplay practices
9 Jul · 6:02 PM