Key facts
- Kentucky enacted a 14.25% excise tax on prediction market transaction fees.
A coalition including Kalshi, Crypto.com, and Polymarket has filed a lawsuit challenging Kentucky's new 14.25% excise tax on prediction markets. The tax is criticized as discriminatory and unconstitutional, potentially clashing with President Trump's views on state regulation of such platforms.

This legal challenge highlights a growing tension between states seeking to regulate and tax new financial instruments and companies pushing for mainstream legitimacy, potentially setting a precedent for how prediction markets are treated across the U.S. and drawing attention to President Trump's views on state versus federal regulatory authority.
A coalition of prediction market operators, including Kalshi, Crypto.com, and Polymarket, has filed a lawsuit challenging Kentucky's new 14.25% excise tax on their transaction fees. Enacted in April, the tax is described in the lawsuit as discriminatory, unconstitutional, and preempted by federal law. The coalition, operating under the name Coalition for Fair Markets, argues that the tax disincentivizes prediction markets and is higher than the 9.75% tax applied to wagers at Kentucky's horse tracks.
Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman has vowed to defend the tax, framing it as integral to the state's sports betting laws and characterizing the out-of-state challengers as threats. The lawsuit contends that taxing federally regulated markets pushes users toward illegal platforms lacking oversight. Prediction markets aim to gain legitimacy by allowing trades on real-world events, though recent insider trading allegations, including those involving former Rep. George Santos and an Army soldier, have surfaced.