All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Idaho abortion ban unconstitutional for health exceptions, US judge rules

Created at 14 Aug · 5:51 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

A U.S. judge ruled Idaho's near-total abortion ban unconstitutional, stating it violates the 14th Amendment by not allowing abortions for broader health risks beyond life-saving measures. The ruling blocks enforcement of laws prohibiting abortion care for serious medical conditions, including mental health risks.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

81-pageruling length
14thAmendment

Who's Involved

Lynn Winmill
U.S. District Judge who issued the ruling
Raul Labrador
Idaho Attorney General who will appeal the decision
Stacy Seyb
Plaintiff and maternal-fetal medicine specialist
Stephanie Toti
Executive Director of The Lawyering Project
Blaine Conzatti
President of the Idaho Family Policy Center
Idaho abortion ban unconstitutional for health exceptions, US judge rules

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling challenges state-level abortion bans by establishing a federal constitutional right to abortion for health preservation, potentially impacting similar laws in other states and setting a precedent for future legal battles over reproductive rights.

Key facts

  • A U.S. judge ruled Idaho's near-total abortion ban unconstitutional.
  • The ruling stated the ban violates the 14th Amendment by not allowing abortions for broader health risks.
  • The judge blocked enforcement of laws prohibiting abortion care for serious medical conditions, including mental health risks.
  • Idaho's Attorney General announced plans to appeal the decision.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Winmill ruled that Idaho's near-total abortion ban is unconstitutional because it does not provide exceptions for broader risks to pregnant women's health, only for life-saving measures. In an 81-page ruling, Winmill stated that the right to a health-preserving abortion is protected by the 14th Amendment.

The decision, issued late Thursday, is the first by a federal judge to recognize a constitutional right to abortion in certain circumstances since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. Winmill blocked the enforcement of two Idaho laws that prohibit doctors from providing abortion care to patients with serious medical conditions, including mental health conditions that could increase the risk of self-harm and suicide.

Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador, a Republican, stated that his office would appeal the ruling, calling it an instance of the judge "legislating from the bench" and "manufactur[ing] a new constitutional right to abortion."

Lawyers for the plaintiff, maternal-fetal medicine specialist Stacy Seyb, welcomed the decision. Stephanie Toti, executive director of The Lawyering Project, said the ruling reduces the risk of death or serious injury to pregnant individuals in Idaho from preventable causes.

The Idaho Family Policy Center, a conservative group opposing abortion, noted that the state's abortion ban largely remains in effect, including provisions allowing relatives of an aborted fetus to sue providers. Blaine Conzatti, the group's president, stated that physicians performing prohibited abortions could still face legal liability.

Judge Winmill declined to block a ban on abortions for fetuses with life-limiting conditions unless the condition posed a serious threat to the mother's health, acknowledging that some might find the law cruel but that the Constitution allows state lawmakers such discretion. However, he wrote that prohibiting women from obtaining essential medical care when pregnancy poses a severe danger contradicts a long tradition of recognizing abortions as necessary to prevent serious and lasting harm.

Frequently asked questions

The judge ruled that Idaho's near-total abortion ban is unconstitutional because it fails to provide exceptions for abortions necessary to preserve a woman's health, not just her life.

The ruling cites the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees due process and equal protection under the law.

The judge blocked enforcement for serious medical conditions, including mental health conditions that can raise the risk of self-harm and suicide.

Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador stated his office would appeal the decision, calling it an instance of the judge legislating from the bench.

What Happens Next

01Idaho's Attorney General's office will appeal the decision.
02The case may proceed to higher federal courts for review.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

A U.S. judge ruled Idaho's near-total abortion ban unconstitutional.
The ruling stated the ban violates the 14th Amendment by not allowing abortions for broader health risks.
The judge blocked enforcement of laws prohibiting abortion care for serious medical conditions, including mental health risks.
Idaho's Attorney General announced plans to appeal the decision.

Sources

T1
Idaho must allow abortions to preserve women's health, US judge rulesReuters

Related Stories

US appeals court revives Justice Department subpoena to gender-affirming care provider
14 Aug · 6:34 PM
US anti-bias agency drops lawsuit against Nike after compliance
13 Aug · 8:47 PM
US court backs Trump's power to close 'de minimis' tariff exemption
13 Aug · 8:43 PM
France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s
14 Aug · 1:23 PM
Los Angeles County to speed up gun licensing to settle US lawsuit
13 Aug · 9:57 PM