HomeAll NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

ICC prosecutor faces removal vote amid politicization claims

Created at 23 Jul · 11:41 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Member states of the International Criminal Court (ICC) are set to vote on the dismissal of chief prosecutor Karim Khan over alleged misconduct. Critics warn the process has been politicized, with Khan's lawyers denied a chance to defend him.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

125ICC member states
63States needed for absolute majority to remove prosecutor
24Years in ICC history for such a vote
8 JuneDate of ASP bureau's decision
May 2024Date Khan sought arrest warrants
October 2024Date allegations resurfaced on social media
150-pageLength of UN investigators' report
5,000 pagesEvidence submitted by UN investigators

Who's Involved

Karim Khan
ICC chief prosecutor facing removal vote
Assembly of States Parties (ASP)
ICC's governing body holding the vote
Tayab Ali
One of Karim Khan's lawyers
Sareta Ashraph
One of Karim Khan's lawyers
Sarah
Complainant in misconduct allegations against Khan
United Nations’ Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS)
Conducted external investigation into Khan
Marco Rubio
US Secretary of State threatening ICC action
Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister for whom Khan sought arrest warrants
Yoav Gallant
Former Israeli Defence Minister for whom Khan sought arrest warrants
Hamas leaders
Group for whom Khan sought arrest warrants
Josep Borrell
Former EU foreign policy chief accusing ASP of political vote
ICC prosecutor faces removal vote amid politicization claims

↳ Why This Matters

The vote on Karim Khan's future as ICC prosecutor carries significant implications for the court's independence and its ability to pursue international justice, particularly in the context of ongoing geopolitical tensions and threats against the institution.

Key facts

  • ICC member states will vote on dismissing chief prosecutor Karim Khan.
  • Khan's lawyers were denied accreditation to attend the vote and present a defense.
  • The vote is based on allegations of an inappropriate sexual relationship with a complainant.
  • A UN investigation concluded no misconduct, but this finding was disregarded by some bureau members.
  • The ASP bureau altered the voting process to lower the threshold for removal.
  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has threatened to 'dismantle the ICC'.

Member states of the International Criminal Court (ICC) are scheduled to convene at the United Nations headquarters in New York for a vote that could lead to the dismissal of chief prosecutor Karim Khan. This marks the first time in the ICC's 24-year history that member states will vote on removing a sitting chief prosecutor.

The Assembly of States Parties (ASP), comprising the court's 125 members, will conduct a secret ballot, requiring an absolute majority of 63 states to remove Khan. Khan's legal team has stated they were denied accreditation to attend the session and present a defense, asserting that all formal channels to address the assembly have been closed. His lawyers expressed dismay, noting that no fair legal system bars a person facing such severe professional sanctions from being heard.

The vote centers on a finding by the ASP bureau that Khan engaged in an inappropriate sexual relationship with a complainant, citing a power imbalance. Khan denies any sexual relationship, while the complainant alleges non-consensual conduct. An external investigation by the UN's Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) looked into these allegations and three claims of retaliation by Khan. A three-judge panel reviewed the OIOS report and concluded that it failed to establish any misconduct or breach of duty.

The process leading to Friday's vote has drawn criticism, with concerns that it has become politicized. This is particularly after a majority of bureau members reportedly disregarded the judges' panel opinion that found no wrongdoing. The vote follows threats from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to "dismantle the ICC" and sanctions imposed by the US on ICC judges and prosecutors over their work on Palestine and Afghanistan war crimes investigations. Josep Borrell, former EU foreign policy chief, accused the ASP of holding a "political vote" rather than upholding judicial findings.

The complaint against Khan includes allegations of sexual assault occurring over nearly a year, beginning in March 2023. Khan's decision to seek arrest warrants for Israeli and Hamas leaders in May 2024 has been suggested by some media reports as a move to gain support amidst the allegations against him. However, an investigation suggests the warrant application was made six weeks before the harassment allegations surfaced.

Frequently asked questions

The vote is to decide whether to dismiss ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan over alleged misconduct, specifically an inappropriate sexual relationship with a complainant.

This is the first time in the ICC's 24-year history that member states will vote on removing a sitting chief prosecutor.

Khan's lawyers stated they were denied accreditation to attend the session and present a defense, and that all formal channels to address the assembly have been closed.

The ASP bureau made a finding that Khan engaged in an inappropriate sexual relationship, and its handling of the investigation has been criticized as politicized.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has threatened to 'dismantle the ICC', and the US has sanctioned ICC judges and prosecutors.

What Happens Next

01The vote result is expected to be announced by the end of Friday.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Member states of the ICC will vote on whether to dismiss chief prosecutor Karim Khan.
Khan's lawyers were denied accreditation to attend the session and present a defense.
The vote concerns allegations of an inappropriate sexual relationship with a complainant.
A UN investigation's findings were disregarded by some bureau members.
The ASP bureau changed the voting process to lower the threshold for removal.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio threatened to 'dismantle the ICC'.
Khan had previously sought arrest warrants for Israeli and Hamas leaders.
Sponsored

London Quick Take - 22 July - UK inflation softens, oil rises and chips rally ahead of Alphabet, Tesla earnings

SAXO

Sources

T1
Khan faces historic removal vote as critics warn ICC process has been politicisedMiddle East Eye

Related Stories

UN Secretary-General Role: Powers, History, and Selection Process
23 Jul · 9:31 AM
Palestine Action trial lawyer’s prosecution criticised as ‘chilling’ for profession
23 Jul · 7:21 AM
US judge to weigh New York Times subpoenas over Trump plane reporting
23 Jul · 10:10 AM
Spanish minister seeks UN labour agency head role amid US funding cuts
23 Jul · 11:06 AM
Philippines VP Sara Duterte faces heightened scrutiny after court ruling
22 Jul · 2:11 PM