Health law experts have strongly criticized a Trump administration order for a mandatory quarantine of an individual exposed to hantavirus, labeling it "authoritarian," "unconstitutional," and lacking scientific evidence. The order, issued by Robert F Kennedy Jr., secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), overrides a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that the individual, Angela Perryman, be allowed to self-quarantine.
Perryman, a passenger on the MV Hondius cruise ship, came into contact with another passenger sickened by Andes virus, a type of hantavirus. While the CDC's Michael Bell concluded Perryman could effectively quarantine at home with daily remote monitoring, Kennedy's order on June 15 mandated institutional quarantine. HHS spokesperson Courtney Spencer stated the quarantine was necessary to ensure Perryman's and the community's wellbeing in the absence of proper home monitoring by state authorities.
Experts like Lawrence Gostin and James Hodge, who were involved in drafting the CDC's quarantine rules, argue that the secretary's decision to override the agency's medical review is unprecedented and a violation of constitutional rights. They contend that such actions, especially without clear scientific rationale, set a dangerous precedent for future public health responses to pathogens like Ebola, potentially leading to public distrust and evasion of reporting requirements. Hodge specifically noted that officials are constitutionally required to provide scientific justification for quarantine orders, a step he believes was not taken in this instance.