HomeEverything
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
← All Stories

Creatives protest copyright concerns over proposed datacentre deal

Created at 1 Jul · 6:30 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Australian creatives are raising alarms over potential copyright law changes that could facilitate AI companies' access to creative content for training models. Senator David Pocock has labeled a proposed deal, which includes over $50 billion in datacentre investment in exchange for an artists' fund, as an "ultimate dirty deal."

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

$50bndatacentre investment proposal
$350mannual fund for artists

Who's Involved

David Pocock
Independent Senator calling the proposal the 'ultimate dirty deal'
Paul Dempsey
Lead singer of Something for Kate, speaking out against copyright dilution
Anna Funder
Author describing herself as a 'victim of crime' due to big tech's use of her work
Michelle Rowland
Attorney-General's spokesperson stating no plans to weaken copyright protections
Holly Rankin
Musician (Jack River), urging government not to sign away artists' rights

↳ Why This Matters

The debate highlights a critical tension between fostering AI innovation and protecting intellectual property rights for creators. A potential government decision could set a precedent for how AI development interacts with copyright law, impacting the livelihoods of artists and the value of creative content.

Key facts

  • Creatives are concerned that a proposed deal to attract over $50 billion in datacentre investment could lead to weakened copyright laws.
  • The proposal reportedly includes special exemptions for AI companies to mine creative content for training models.
  • In return, tech companies would fund an artists' fund of $350 million annually and invest in datacentres.
  • Senator David Pocock has strongly criticized the proposal, calling it the "ultimate dirty deal" and urging the government to reject it.
  • The government has repeatedly stated it has no plans to weaken copyright protections and is committed to supporting creative industries while fostering AI innovation.

Creatives in Australia are expressing alarm over a potential government deal that could see copyright laws weakened in exchange for significant investment in datacentres by tech giants. The proposal, reportedly presented to the cabinet, suggests granting AI companies special exemptions to mine creative content for training their models. In return, these companies would reportedly bankroll an annual artists' fund of $350 million and commit over $50 billion to datacentre investments.

Independent Senator David Pocock has vehemently opposed the plan, labeling it the "ultimate dirty deal" and demanding the government categorically rule it out. He stated that the government is considering "selling out Australian musicians, writers, authors and other creatives" for datacentre investment, which he described as "wildly unregulated."

Musicians and authors have voiced strong opposition. Paul Dempsey, lead singer of Something for Kate, questioned the logic of diluting copyright for multinational tech companies. Author Anna Funder described herself as a "victim of crime," citing how her books have been used by big tech without adequate compensation.

The government has insisted it has no plans to weaken copyright protections and is committed to a framework that supports both creative industries and AI innovation. A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland reiterated that the government is encouraging tech firms and creatives to negotiate deals to ensure creators are compensated while fostering innovation. However, creatives like musician Holly Rankin (Jack River) are urging the government not to "back down" and to ensure artists are asked for permission and paid for their work.

Frequently asked questions

Creatives are concerned that a proposed deal to attract datacentre investment could lead to the weakening of copyright laws, allowing AI companies to use their work for training without proper compensation.

Senator Pocock has strongly criticized the proposal, calling it the "ultimate dirty deal" and urging the government to categorically reject any carve-outs or exemptions to copyright law.

The government has repeatedly stated that it has no plans to weaken copyright protections and is committed to a copyright framework that supports both creative industries and AI innovation.

The proposal reportedly involves AI companies receiving exemptions to mine creative content in exchange for funding an artists' fund and investing over $50 billion in datacentres.

What Happens Next

01The government is expected to make a decision on the datacentre investment proposal.
02Tech giants and creative industries are encouraged to negotiate compensation deals.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

A proposal has been presented to the Australian cabinet that could grant AI companies exemptions to mine creative content.
In exchange for these exemptions, tech companies would fund an artists' fund and invest over $50 billion in datacentres.
Senator David Pocock has called the proposal the "ultimate dirty deal" and demanded the government rule it out.
Creatives, including musicians and authors, have voiced concerns about weakening copyright laws for AI training.
The government has stated it has no plans to weaken copyright protections and is committed to a fit-for-purpose framework.
The government is encouraging tech giants and creatives to negotiate deals for innovation and creator compensation.

Sources

T1
Creatives sound alarm on copyright as Pocock calls $50bn datacentre proposal ‘ultimate dirty deal’The Guardian

Related Stories

Labor's gambling ad reforms called 'capitulation' by Liberal MP
30 Jun · 10:10 AM
Trump's AI-driven government website redesign plan faces delays and criticism
30 Jun · 5:06 PM
US Senators Propose Bill to Block Foreign Adversaries From AI Technology
30 Jun · 11:10 PM
Apple warns UK app store reforms could invite scams
30 Jun · 11:25 AM
Reynolds rejected Thames Water rescue deal without meeting investors
1 Jul · 3:05 AM