All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

ACLU, groups sue to block Trump effort to curtail birthright citizenship

Created at 11 Aug · 2:54 PM2 sources↑ Market-relevant2 events
IN SHORT

The ACLU and other groups sued to block President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, which was later struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

6-to-3Supreme Court decision split on birthright citizenship order
February 19, 2025Effective date of executive order on birthright citizenship
100 yearsSupreme Court precedent on birthright citizenship

Who's Involved

ACLU
Filed lawsuit to block birthright citizenship curtailment
Donald Trump
President who attempted to curtail birthright citizenship and is assessing challenge to NY tax
Supreme Court
Ruled executive order on birthright citizenship unconstitutional
Cecillia Wang
ACLU National Legal Director who argued the case
Anthony D. Romero
ACLU Executive Director
Janai Nelson
President and Director-Counsel of the Legal Defense Fund
Aarti Kohli
Executive Director of the Asian Law Caucus
Norm Eisen
Co-founder and Executive Chair of Democracy Defenders Fund
ACLU, groups sue to block Trump effort to curtail birthright citizenship

↳ Why This Matters

The Supreme Court's decision reaffirms the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship, preventing a president from altering it via executive order. Trump's consideration of a challenge to New York's tax highlights ongoing tensions between state and federal authority on fiscal matters.

Key facts

  • The ACLU and partner organizations sued to block President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
  • The executive order sought to restrict citizenship for babies born after February 19, 2025, to parents without permanent legal status.
  • Federal courts had previously blocked the order.
  • The Supreme Court ruled 6-to-3 that the executive order was unconstitutional.
  • The ruling reaffirmed birthright citizenship as a constitutional guarantee.
  • President Donald Trump is considering a federal challenge to New York's 'pied-a-terre' tax on luxury second homes.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other legal groups sued to block an executive order by U.S. President Donald Trump that sought to curtail birthright citizenship. The order, signed on the first day of Trump's second term, imposed restrictive stipulations on citizenship for babies born after February 19, 2025, to parents without permanent legal status.

Federal courts had previously blocked the administration from implementing the executive order, citing violations of the Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and federal statute. The class action lawsuit, Barbara v. Trump, brought by the ACLU and its partners, reached the Supreme Court.

On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court, in a 6-to-3 decision, struck down the executive order, declaring it unconstitutional. The ruling reaffirmed the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship, stating that a president cannot change the Constitution by executive fiat. ACLU National Legal Director Cecillia Wang argued the case before the Supreme Court, emphasizing that birthright citizenship is a fundamental American promise.

Separately, President Donald Trump stated he is assessing whether the federal government can legally challenge New York's new progressive surcharge on luxury second homes, calling it a "dangerous political experiment." The tax, passed in May as part of the New York state budget, has already faced a state court challenge, with a judge temporarily blocking its rollout.

Frequently asked questions

The order sought to impose restrictive stipulations on birthright citizenship for babies born after February 19, 2025, to parents without permanent legal status.

The Supreme Court struck down the executive order as unconstitutional in a 6-to-3 decision.

The lawsuit was brought by the ACLU and partner organizations, including the Legal Defense Fund, Asian Law Caucus, and Democracy Defenders Fund, against President Donald Trump.

Birthright citizenship is the principle that any child born on U.S. soil is automatically a citizen, as guaranteed by the Constitution.

What Happens Next

01The ACLU continues to defend birthright citizenship.
02Further legal challenges or legislative efforts related to citizenship may arise.
03President Trump's administration may pursue legal avenues regarding New York's 'pied-a-terre' tax.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

The ACLU and partner organizations sued to block President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
The executive order, signed on the first day of Trump's second term, affected babies born after February 19, 2025, to parents without permanent legal status.
Federal courts had previously blocked the order, finding it unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-to-3 that the executive order was unconstitutional.
The ruling reaffirms that birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Constitution.
President Donald Trump is assessing a federal legal challenge to New York's tax on luxury second homes.

Sources

T1
ACLU, other groups sue to block Trump effort to curtail birthright citizenshipReuters
T2
Barbara v. Donald J. Trump - American Civil Liberties Unionaclu.org
T2
Groups Representing Plaintiffs Respond to Supreme Court Birthright ...aclu.org
T2
Barbara v. Trump - Class Action to Protect Birthright Citizenshipaclumaine.org

Related Stories

US rights groups sue Trump administration over anti-ICC sanctions
11 Aug · 2:36 PM
FlightAware sues Kalshi over flight-cancellation markets
11 Aug · 7:07 AM
Trump directs agencies to align with study recommending fewer childhood vaccines
10 Aug · 6:28 PM
Trump extends Jones Act waiver with limitations
10 Aug · 5:17 PM
US State Department Revokes Over 175,000 Visas Under Trump Administration
10 Aug · 5:05 PM