All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
© PiQ · The news that matters, on your cadence.AboutFAQTermsPrivacyDMCA
← Back to US Politics & Policy

Montana ballot measure could reshape corporate political spending

Created at 16 Sep · 10:08 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Montana voters will decide in November whether to become the first state to bar corporations from spending money on elections, a move that could set a precedent for similar efforts nationwide. The ballot initiative, known as Initiative 194, aims to circumvent the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling by targeting corporate powers granted by the state, rather than corporate rights.

Key Numbers

19point margin by which President Donald Trump won Montana in 2024
79% of Americans across parties who support a constitutional amendment to restore
15years since the Citizens United campaign finance ruling
32states with similar initiatives active or under consideration
162million dollars in independent political expenditures in Montana in 2024
33,000dollars in independent political expenditures in Montana in 2008

Who's Involved

Donald Trump
won Montana by nearly 20 points in 2024
Tom Moore
lawyer with the Center for American Progress and legal architect of the movement
Sam Forstag
populist Democrat championing Initiative 194
Marc Racicot
former Republican Governor and supporter of Initiative 194
Steve Hadnagy
conservative libertarian planning to vote yes on I-194
Lorraine Clarno
CEO of the Kalispell Chamber of Commerce
Todd O'Hair
president of the Montana Chamber of Commerce
Justin Levitt
Loyola University law professor
Montana ballot measure could reshape corporate political spending

↳ Why This Matters

If successful, Montana's ballot initiative could provide a blueprint for other states to restrict corporate political spending, potentially leading to another Supreme Court showdown over campaign finance laws and altering the landscape of election funding nationwide.

Key facts

  • Montana voters will decide in November on Initiative 194, a ballot measure to ban corporate spending in state elections.
  • The initiative aims to bar all "artificial persons" from political spending, including unions, C4s, and corporations doing business in the state.
  • The measure is inspired by a similar law passed by Hawaii's legislature earlier this year.
  • Versions of Initiative 194 are active or under consideration in some 32 states.
  • Montana voters passed a similar Corrupt Practices Act in 1912, which banned corporate election spending until it was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012.

Montana voters will decide in November whether to become the first state to ban corporations from spending money on elections through a ballot initiative, a move that could set a precedent for similar efforts nationwide. The initiative, dubbed the “Montana Plan” or Initiative 194, is a novel legal strategy that seeks to sidestep the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United ruling by targeting corporate powers granted by the state, rather than challenging the ruling directly.

Supporters argue that the measure taps into growing, bipartisan anger over the pervasiveness of "dark money" in elections, with a Brennan Center for Justice survey finding 79% of Americans across parties would support a constitutional amendment to restore limits on political spending. The Montana Plan would bar all “artificial persons,” including unions, 501(c)(4) nonprofits, and any corporation doing business in the state, from political spending, though it would not stop wealthy individuals from spending freely, but they would no longer be able to do so anonymously.

Opposition to the plan has been led by Montana's business community. The Montana Chamber of Commerce filed an unsuccessful lawsuit to keep the initiative off the ballot, viewing it as unconstitutional. Legal experts are divided on its prospects, with some calling it "bold and unusual" and others skeptical that the Supreme Court's conservative majority would uphold it.

Distrust of corporate power runs deep in Montana, with a history of scandals involving mining barons in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Voters responded in 1912 by passing a Corrupt Practices Act, also by ballot initiative, banning corporate election spending, a law that held until it was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012. Versions of Initiative 194 are active or under consideration in some 32 states, according to Tom Moore, a lawyer with the Center for American Progress.

Frequently asked questions

The 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court ruling established that corporations and unions have the First Amendment right to spend unlimited money on elections independent of individual campaigns, leading to the rise of super PACs and 501(c)(4) nonprofits that can spend "dark money" without disclosing donors.

Initiative 194 works around the Citizens United ruling by targeting corporate powers granted by state governments, which have the authority to redefine or revoke them, rather than directly challenging the Supreme Court's decision on corporate rights.

Dark money refers to political spending by organizations, typically 501(c)(4) nonprofits, that do not disclose their donors, making it difficult to track the source of funds used in elections.

Montana voters passed a Corrupt Practices Act in 1912 by ballot initiative, banning corporate election spending. This law was in effect until it was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012.

What Happens Next

01Montana voters will decide on Initiative 194 in the November election.
02Hawaii's legislature passed a similar law earlier this year.
03Versions of Initiative 194 are active or under consideration in some 32 states.
CME Headlines
  • Treasury Secretary testifies today.
    15 Sep · 8:39 PM
  • Treasury Secretary testifies today.
    15 Sep · 8:39 PM
  • Treasury Secretary testifies today.
    15 Sep · 8:39 PM

How It Developed

Montana voters will decide in November on Initiative 194, a ballot measure to ban corporate spending in state elections.
Hawaii's legislature passed a similar law earlier this year.
Versions of Initiative 194 are active or under consideration in some 32 states.

Sources

T1
Deep in Trump country, a revolt against corporate money could reshape political spendingReuters

Related Stories

Montana Senate candidate calls for federal limits on surveillance tech after shooting decoy camera
16 Sep · 9:21 AM
Trump campaigns in North Carolina to boost Republican Senate candidate
16 Sep · 10:08 AM
Russian anti-war candidate mounts long-shot parliamentary bid amid fears of reprisal
16 Sep · 9:06 AM
Trump accelerates judicial appointments ahead of potential Senate shift
16 Sep · 4:11 AM
Trump administration appeals ruling blocking EPA from sending California auto emissions rules to Congress
15 Sep · 8:18 PM