All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to Real Estate & Property

Eighth Circuit upholds NAR commission lawsuit settlement

Created at 19 Aug · 4:56 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a federal court's approval of the National Association of Realtors' settlement agreement regarding home seller commission lawsuits. The ruling rejected arguments that the settlement was too broad or unfair.

Key Numbers

November 2024date of final settlement approval
August 19date for petition for rehearing

Who's Involved

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
upheld the federal court's approval of the NAR settlement
National Association of Realtors (NAR)
trade group pleased with court's order affirming settlement approval
Eighth Circuit upholds NAR commission lawsuit settlement

↳ Why This Matters

This ruling solidifies the changes to real estate commission practices nationwide, impacting how agents are compensated and potentially influencing transaction costs for buyers and sellers.

Key facts

  • The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the National Association of Realtors' settlement agreement concerning home seller commission lawsuits.
  • The court rejected arguments that the settlement was too broad, unfair, improperly handled, or procedurally defective.
  • The nationwide scope of the settlement was deemed justified by the court.
  • The court found that buyers were adequately represented and that practice changes benefit the entire class.
  • Objectors' claims of due-process violations related to the fairness hearing were dismissed.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a federal court's approval of the National Association of Realtors' (NAR) settlement agreement related to home seller commission lawsuits. This decision comes nearly two years after the business practice changes stemming from the settlement went into effect.

The appeals court issued its judgment on seven consolidated appeals concerning the final approval of the nationwide settlement, which occurred in November 2024. The court rejected the objectors' arguments that the settlement was too broad, unfair to certain class members, improperly handled, or procedurally defective.

According to the court's opinion, the nationwide scope of the settlement was justified due to evidence of a nationwide conspiracy and the necessity of a nationwide release to achieve the settlement. The appeals court also dismissed claims that buyers were inadequately represented, stating that the practice changes benefit the entire class and that payments would consider commissions paid by class members.

Furthermore, the court found no due-process violation despite the district court requiring objectors to attend the fairness hearing in person, as objectors received notice, had an opportunity to present their objections, and their arguments were considered on their merits.

Parties involved have two weeks from August 19 to file a petition for rehearing. A spokesperson for NAR stated the trade group is pleased with the court's order and will continue to work towards fair, transparent, and pro-consumer real estate markets.

Frequently asked questions

The settlement addressed lawsuits alleging a conspiracy regarding home seller commissions, leading to changes in how real estate agents are compensated.

The Eighth Circuit upheld the lower court's approval of the settlement in full, rejecting all objections.

The ruling confirms the new commission practices, which could affect agent compensation and transaction costs in the real estate market.

What Happens Next

01Parties have two weeks from August 19 to file a petition for rehearing.

How It Developed

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the federal court's approval of the NAR settlement.
The appeals court rejected objectors' arguments that the settlement was too broad, unfair, improperly handled, or procedurally defective.
The court found that the nationwide scope of the settlement was justified and that buyers were adequately represented.
Objectors' due-process claims regarding the fairness hearing were also rejected.
Parties have two weeks from August 19 to file a petition for rehearing.
NAR expressed pleasure with the court's decision, stating they will continue to foster fair, transparent, and pro-consumer real estate markets.

Sources

T1
Eighth Circuit upholds NAR commission lawsuit settlementHousingWire

Related Stories

NAR launches quarterly index for commercial real estate demand
19 Aug · 2:26 PM
Mortgage applications fall 0.4% as rates see little change
19 Aug · 1:31 PM
National housing trends mask local market divergences
19 Aug · 2:06 PM
US housing market faces persistent affordability challenges
19 Aug · 10:00 AM
Evergreen Home Loans launches BrokerBrand TPO channel for independent brokers
19 Aug · 3:31 PM