Key facts
- Stablecoins are not a credible means of payment at scale, according to BIS General Manager Pablo Hernandez de Cos.
- Tokenized deposits offer a more compelling case for harnessing new technology in daily payments, de Cos said.
- Concerns were raised about stablecoins' potential impact on financial stability, money laundering, and monetary sovereignty.
- De Cos noted that stablecoins can increase bank funding costs and break the 'singleness' of money.
- U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent previously supported stablecoins, viewing them as a digital revolution.
Pablo Hernandez de Cos, General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), stated that stablecoins are not a credible means of payment at scale. He argued that tokenized deposits present a more compelling case for leveraging new technology in daily transactions.
Speaking at the U.S. Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, de Cos acknowledged that stablecoins and tokenized deposits could coexist. However, he asserted that tokenized deposits should handle the majority of day-to-day payments, with stablecoins relegated to more specialized roles.