Key facts
- European buyers are reluctant to sign long-term LNG supply deals with U.S. exporters.
European buyers are hesitant to commit to long-term U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply agreements, despite phasing out Russian gas and facing Middle East supply concerns. Concerns exist about replacing reliance on Russia with dependence on the U.S.

Europe's hesitance to secure long-term U.S. LNG contracts highlights the complex energy security considerations and the desire to diversify supply sources beyond a single dominant provider, even amidst global market tightness.
European energy buyers are showing reluctance to commit to long-term liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply agreements with U.S. exporters, despite the European Union's ongoing efforts to phase out Russian gas imports and navigate supply challenges in the Middle East. Executives from U.S. LNG export projects have noted that while European entities are engaging in discussions, they are hesitant to finalize long-term deals this year.
This caution stems from a concern within Europe about potentially replacing a long-standing reliance on Russian gas with a new dependence on the United States. The EU has been progressively reducing its intake of Russian gas, with a ban on spot contract imports of Russian LNG taking effect on April 25 and a complete phase-out of all Russian gas imports, including pipeline gas, planned by the autumn of 2027.
Forecasts from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) suggest that the EU could be sourcing as much as 80% of its LNG imports from the United States by 2028. In parallel, several European energy utilities have expressed interest in the future output of Canada's Ksi Lisims LNG project. The project, led by Western LNG, already has offtake agreements for 5 million tons annually and is seeking commitments for an additional 3 to 4 million tons.