All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

German Court Rules AI Music Firm Suno Infringed Copyrights

Created at 31 Jul · 8:10 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

A German court ruled that AI music company Suno infringed copyrights by using music from GEMA's catalog without a license for both AI model training and music generation. Suno disagrees with the ruling and is considering an appeal.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

113,000hours of YouTube Music in Suno's training data
62,000hours from Pond5 in Suno's training data
12,000hours from Deezer in Suno's training data

Who's Involved

Suno
AI music startup facing copyright lawsuit
GEMA
Music rights organization that brought the lawsuit
Munich Regional Court
German court that issued the ruling
German Court Rules AI Music Firm Suno Infringed Copyrights

↳ Why This Matters

This ruling establishes a precedent in Germany requiring AI companies to secure licenses for copyrighted material used in both training AI models and generating new content, impacting the broader AI industry's use of existing creative works.

Key facts

  • A German court found AI music startup Suno violated copyright law.
  • The ruling states Suno used music from GEMA's catalog to train AI models and reproduce protected works without a license.
  • The decision mandates licenses for AI companies using GEMA's repertoire for commercial purposes, including model training and music generation.
  • Suno expressed disagreement with the ruling, citing a misunderstanding of its technology, and is exploring legal options, including an appeal.
  • A German court has ruled against AI music startup Suno in a copyright lawsuit brought by music rights organization GEMA. The Munich Regional Court found that Suno violated copyright law by using music from GEMA's catalog to train its AI models and by reproducing protected works without a license.

    The ruling requires AI companies to obtain licenses for the commercial use of GEMA's repertoire, covering both AI model training and the generation of music. The lawsuit centered on six songs, including "Daddy Cool," “Rasputin,” “Forever Young,” and “Mambo No. 5.” GEMA accused Suno of training its AI on copyrighted songs without permission.

    In a statement, Suno said it built its platform to help people create new music, not reproduce existing songs. The company stated the ruling is based on a misunderstanding of how its technology works and that it is considering its legal options. "Our tools give people the ability to create new songs... From the beginning, we trained our models to create new songs, not reproduce existing ones, and built protections into our platform. We disagree with today’s ruling—which rests on a fundamental mischaracterization of how Suno’s technology works, how it is used and how U.S. law applies—and are evaluating all available options, including an appeal,” Suno said.

    The decision comes about eight months after GEMA won a separate copyright case against OpenAI, in which a Munich court ruled that ChatGPT unlawfully reproduced copyrighted song lyrics. The ruling also comes as Suno faces mounting legal scrutiny over how it built its AI models. Earlier this month, leaked source code showed the company's training data included more than 113,000 hours of YouTube Music, 62,000 hours from Pond5, and 12,000 hours from Deezer, supporting claims by the music industry that Suno trained its AI on copyrighted recordings without permission, allegations that Suno continues to fight in court.

    Frequently asked questions

    GEMA accused Suno of training its AI models on copyrighted songs from GEMA's catalog without obtaining the necessary licenses.

    The ruling mandates that AI companies must obtain licenses for the commercial use of GEMA's repertoire, covering both the training of AI models and the generation of AI-created music.

    Suno disagrees with the ruling, stating it misunderstands how its technology works and that its tools are designed to create new music, not reproduce existing songs. The company is considering an appeal.

    Yes, GEMA previously won a copyright case against OpenAI, where a Munich court ruled that ChatGPT unlawfully reproduced copyrighted song lyrics.

    What Happens Next

    01Suno is evaluating all available legal options, including an appeal.

    Get the newsletter.

    Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

    Cadence

    How It Developed

    A German court ruled that Suno infringed copyrights by using music from GEMA's catalog without a license.
    The ruling requires AI companies to obtain licenses for commercial use of GEMA's repertoire, covering AI model training and music generation.
    Suno stated it disagrees with the ruling and is considering an appeal.

    Sources

    T1
    AI Music Company Suno Loses Copyright Case in GermanyDecrypt

    Related Stories

    EU mandates AI labels on synthetic content from August 2
    31 Jul · 9:56 AM
    Snapchat to stop rewarding AI-generated Spotlight content
    31 Jul · 5:06 PM
    Social platforms update AI content rules amid concerns over 'slop'
    31 Jul · 9:21 PM
    Chinese Military Researchers Use US AI Model Outputs for Defense Systems
    31 Jul · 4:45 AM
    Samsung unit, Erex to build Japan biomass plant for AI data centers
    30 Jul · 10:00 PM