HomeEverything
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
← All Stories

White House Considers 'Birth Tourism' Crackdown After Supreme Court Ruling

Created at 1 Jul · 6:35 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Following a Supreme Court decision, the White House is exploring policy options to curb 'birth tourism.' Officials are discussing enhanced border enforcement and potential use of existing laws to bar pregnant individuals from entering the U.S. with the intent to give birth.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

212(f)section of federal law

Who's Involved

Tom Homan
Border czar who met with the president
Markwayne Mullin
Department of Homeland Security Secretary who discussed policy options
Stephen Miller
White House deputy chief of staff of policy who met with the president
Abigail Jackson
White House spokesperson committed to protecting citizenship
Ken Cuccinelli
Former deputy DHS secretary arguing for barring pregnant women
Jessica Vaughan
Director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies

↳ Why This Matters

The White House's consideration of new policies to restrict 'birth tourism' signals a potential shift in immigration enforcement, aiming to address concerns about the integrity of citizenship and border security.

Key facts

  • The White House is considering policy options to crack down on 'birth tourism' after a Supreme Court loss.
  • Officials discussed enhancing border security and deporting undocumented immigrants.
  • The administration may use Section 212(f) of federal law to ban some immigrants.
  • Current laws allow for barring pregnant women from entering the U.S. if their primary purpose is to give birth.
  • Consular officers and CBP have discretion to deny visas and entry based on intent.

The White House is exploring measures to curb 'birth tourism' following a Supreme Court decision that did not directly address the practice. Officials, including Border Czar Tom Homan, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin, and White House Deputy Chief of Staff of Policy Stephen Miller, met with the president to discuss policy options. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson affirmed the administration's commitment to protecting American citizenship and enhancing border security.

The administration is considering increased enforcement actions, potentially leveraging Section 212(f) of federal law to restrict the entry of certain immigrants. This section could be used to ban individuals from entering the U.S., with a focus on pregnant women seeking to give birth on American soil. Allies have indicated that current laws already permit the barring of pregnant women from entry, with the State Department able to deny visas and Customs and Border Protection able to deny entry if the primary purpose of travel is to have a child in the U.S.

Markwayne Mullin suggested that travel during late-term pregnancy could be examined as a national security issue. Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, noted that while pregnant women are not currently prohibited from traveling to the U.S., consular and CBP officers have discretion to deny entry if they suspect the intent is to give birth in the U.S. The administration is also contemplating additional visa restrictions, potentially requiring applicants to disclose pregnancy or plans to give birth in the U.S.

Frequently asked questions

'Birth tourism' refers to individuals traveling to a country with the intent of giving birth there to obtain citizenship for their child.

The article mentions a 'Supreme Court loss on birthright citizenship,' implying a ruling that did not support the administration's stance on the issue, though the specifics of the ruling are not detailed.

Yes, current laws allow consular officers and CBP to deny entry or visas if they believe the primary purpose of travel is to give birth in the U.S.

Section 212(f) of federal law is being discussed as a potential tool to ban certain immigrants from entering the United States.

What Happens Next

01The administration will continue discussing policy options to address 'birth tourism'.
02Further enforcement measures may be implemented to secure the border.
03The use of Section 212(f) for immigration bans is under consideration.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

White House officials met to discuss policy options regarding 'birth tourism'.
The administration is committed to protecting natural-born citizenship and securing the border.
Efforts to remove immigrants on temporary status may be ramped up.
The use of Section 212(f) to ban certain immigrants is being discussed.
Officials stated current law allows barring pregnant women from entry.
Consular officers and CBP can deny entry if the primary purpose is to give birth in the U.S.

Sources

T1
After Supreme Court loss on birthright citizenship, White House eyes crackdown on 'birth tourism'Politico

Related Stories

Supreme Court Expands Presidential Power, Rejects Some Trump Policies
30 Jun · 8:55 PM
Wong Kim Ark's great-grandson hails Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling
30 Jun · 11:35 PM
Supreme Court ruling exacerbates DNC fundraising challenges
30 Jun · 10:50 PM
Haitians Face Uncertainty as US Supreme Court Ends Deportation Protections
1 Jul · 10:07 AM
E. Jean Carroll seeks $5.8M from Trump after Supreme Court appeal denied
1 Jul · 5:06 AM