HomeEverythingEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

UK to continue sending asylum seekers to France despite court ruling

Created at 14 Jul · 1:16 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The UK Home Office plans to continue sending asylum seekers to France, ignoring a high court ruling that found the policy unlawful. The court determined it is illegal not to reconsider initial negative trafficking decisions for individuals earmarked for removal.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

80%trafficking victims with initial negative decisions reversed after reconsiderati
1,525people whose negative trafficking decisions were reversed
30days delay for removals to France

Who's Involved

Mr Justice Sheldon
High court judge who ruled against the Home Office policy
Home Office
UK government department responsible for immigration and border control
Emma Ginn
Director of Medical Justice, an organization working with immigration detainees

↳ Why This Matters

The Home Office's decision to defy a high court ruling on asylum seeker removals to France raises significant concerns about the protection of potential trafficking victims and the rule of law in the UK.

Key facts

  • The UK Home Office intends to continue sending asylum seekers to France, disregarding a high court ruling.
  • The court found the policy of removing asylum seekers without reconsidering trafficking claims to be unlawful.
  • The Home Office's change in guidance last September, denying reconsideration of negative trafficking decisions, was deemed unlawful.
  • Approximately 80% of initial negative trafficking decisions were reversed upon reconsideration in 2025.
  • The Home Office plans to appeal the high court's judgment.

The UK Home Office plans to continue its policy of sending asylum seekers to France, even after a high court ruling declared the practice unlawful. The ruling, issued by Mr Justice Sheldon, found that the Home Office acted unlawfully by failing to reconsider initial negative trafficking decisions for individuals earmarked for removal to France.

Despite the judgment, Home Office sources indicated that operational activity, including weekly chartered flights to France, could continue. Asylum seekers detained for these flights have reported that their claims of being victims of trafficking are not being heard. The court's decision impacts several hundred asylum seekers currently in detention or already returned to France.

The judgment specifically addressed a change in guidance implemented last September, which denied reconsideration of negative trafficking decisions. This guidance has been part of the UK's framework for identifying trafficking victims since 2013. Data presented in court revealed that nearly 80% of individuals who initially received negative trafficking decisions in 2025 had these decisions reversed upon reconsideration.

It also emerged that the UK government was aware of potential issues regarding the treatment of trafficking cases in France before agreeing to a deal last July. Officials noted that asylum seekers might receive 'unofficial' victim status as they were not French and many were not trafficked within France. Emma Ginn, director of Medical Justice, emphasized the need for the Home Office to properly consider medical evidence and allow reconsideration of negative trafficking decisions.

A Home Office spokesperson stated that last-minute modern slavery claims should not be used to frustrate removals and that the department is reforming laws to strengthen protections while preventing dubious claims. The spokesperson confirmed the Home Secretary will fight the judgment in the courts and appeal the decision.

Frequently asked questions

The high court ruled it is unlawful for the UK Home Office to send asylum seekers to France without reconsidering their claims of being victims of trafficking.

The Home Office plans to appeal the judgment and indicated that operational activity regarding removals may continue.

Data from 2025 showed that nearly 80% of initial negative trafficking decisions were reversed after reconsideration.

What Happens Next

01The Home Office will appeal the high court judgment.
02The next chartered flight to France is scheduled for Thursday.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

A high court ruled against the Home Office's policy of removing asylum seekers to France without reconsidering claims of trafficking.
Home Office sources indicated operational activity could continue despite the ruling.
Asylum seekers detained for removal stated the Home Office does not listen to their claims of being trafficking victims.
The ruling raises questions about the status of hundreds of asylum seekers in detention or already returned to France.
The Home Office was found to have acted unlawfully regarding a change in guidance that denied reconsideration of negative trafficking decisions.
Data showed nearly 80% of initial negative trafficking decisions were reversed upon reconsideration in 2025.
The UK government was aware of potential issues with sending asylum seekers to France regarding their trafficking cases before agreeing to a deal.
Medical Justice expressed hope that the Home Office will reconsider negative trafficking decisions following the ruling.

Sources

T1
UK to continue sending potential trafficking victims to France despite court rulingThe Guardian

Related Stories

Asylum seekers face hardship amid UK Home Office hotel closures
14 Jul · 6:16 AM
Andy Burnham to scrap David Lammy's plans to curb jury trials
14 Jul · 11:16 AM
Robert Jenrick criticises government over Nigel Farage security meeting
14 Jul · 9:06 AM
US refunds $81bn in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling
14 Jul · 12:46 AM
Most back refuge for persecuted people, Ipsos poll finds
14 Jul · 1:08 PM