HomeEverythingEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Trump administration plans nuclear pact with Saudi Arabia lacking safeguards

Created at 22 Jul · 1:21 AM3 sources↑ Market-relevant2 events
IN SHORT

The Trump administration intends to submit a nuclear energy pact with Saudi Arabia to Congress that omits safeguards against using nuclear materials for weapons, sources told Reuters. The deal could allow uranium enrichment.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

30-yearnuclear deal duration
123 Agreementtype of pact
90 dayscongressional review period

Who's Involved

Donald Trump
US President who approved the nuclear deal
Saudi Arabia
Gulf country receiving civilian nuclear program
Chris Wright
US Energy Secretary signing the pact
Abdulaziz bin Salman
Saudi energy minister signing the pact
Mohammed bin Salman
Saudi Crown Prince fueling proliferation concerns
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
UN nuclear watchdog
Trump administration plans nuclear pact with Saudi Arabia lacking safeguards

↳ Why This Matters

The deal's potential lack of stringent safeguards raises concerns about nuclear proliferation in the Middle East, particularly given Saudi Arabia's stated intentions if Iran were to develop nuclear weapons. This could escalate regional tensions and alter the global non-proliferation landscape.

Key facts

  • President Trump has approved a 30-year civil nuclear cooperation deal with Saudi Arabia.
  • The agreement may permit Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium domestically.
  • The pact is expected to be submitted to Congress soon.
  • Sources indicate the deal lacks safeguards against nuclear weapons development and the IAEA's Additional Protocol.
  • The agreement is a 123 Agreement, required for U.S. entities to work with foreign countries on nuclear technology.

The Trump administration is preparing to submit a 30-year nuclear energy pact with Saudi Arabia to Congress, which sources say omits safeguards against using nuclear materials for weapons programs. The agreement, known as a 123 Agreement, is required for the U.S. and American companies to collaborate with Saudi entities on developing a civil nuclear industry. While the pact provides a legal pathway for cooperation on the nuclear fuel cycle, including uranium enrichment, it does not obligate the U.S. to transfer related capabilities or technology. Concerns have been amplified by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's past statements that the kingdom would pursue nuclear weapons if Iran developed them. Unlike agreements with the UAE, Morocco, and others, this deal reportedly lacks the "Gold Standard" to block enrichment and reprocessing, and the IAEA's "Additional Protocol" for broader oversight.

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright previously stated the preliminary agreement was not about enrichment and contained nonproliferation standards from the Atomic Energy Act. However, sources familiar with the deal indicate it does not include the stringent measures that could prevent materials from being used in nuclear weapons programs. The administration plans to submit the agreement to Congress for a review period of approximately 90 days, during which lawmakers could object. Blocking the pact would require a joint resolution with a two-thirds majority to override a potential presidential veto.

Frequently asked questions

A 123 Agreement is a foundational legal framework that permits the U.S. government and American companies to engage in civilian nuclear cooperation with foreign entities, subject to specific terms and conditions.

Uranium enrichment is a critical step in the process of creating fissile material for nuclear weapons. The concern is that Saudi Arabia could use this technology for military purposes, especially given regional rivalries.

Yes, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman stated in 2018 that Saudi Arabia would develop nuclear weapons if Iran did.

The 'Gold Standard' refers to specific non-proliferation commitments, including blocking enrichment and reprocessing. The 'Additional Protocol' grants the IAEA broader inspection and verification powers.

What Happens Next

01The 123 Agreement will be submitted to Congress for review.
02Congress will have approximately 90 days to review the pact.
03Lawmakers may attempt to pass a joint resolution to block the agreement.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

President Trump approved a 30-year nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia.
The agreement could potentially allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium domestically.
The Trump administration plans to submit the pact to Congress within days.
The deal lacks stringent safeguards against nuclear weapons development and the IAEA's Additional Protocol.
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman previously stated the kingdom would pursue nuclear weapons if Iran acquired them.

Sources

T1
Trump approves nuclear agreement that may allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium, two AP sources sayAP News
T1
Trump to seek Congress approval for Saudi Arabia nuclear energy pact that lacks safeguards, sources sayReuters
T1
Trump approves nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia: ReportMiddle East Eye
T2
Nuclear deal that would permit uranium enrichment by Saudi Arabia in ...edition.cnn.com
T2
Trump administration pursuing nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, opening ...middleeasteye.net

Related Stories

US and Jordan announce trade deal
21 Jul · 4:13 PM
Trump Administration Plans to Reopen U.S. Embassy in Libya
21 Jul · 5:46 PM
Trump readies tariffs on dozens of countries, including 200% on generic drugs later
21 Jul · 10:19 AM
Commerce recommends keeping Moroccan phosphate duty
21 Jul · 9:41 PM
Trump: Midterms won't affect Iran war plans despite soldier deaths
21 Jul · 5:46 PM