All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictions

Created at 27 Jul · 7:40 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to permit the nationwide implementation of an executive order that would tighten rules for mail-in voting. This move follows a federal judge's ruling that blocked key provisions of the order.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

23states challenging the order
37-pageruling length
2021year of Postal Service-NAACP agreement

Who's Involved

Donald Trump
President whose administration is seeking to implement mail-in ballot restrictions
U.S. Supreme Court
Court asked to allow implementation of mail-in ballot restrictions
Justice Department
Filed request to put judge's ruling on hold
Indira Talwani
U.S. District Judge who halted key provisions of the executive order
U.S. Postal Service
Agency tasked with handling mail-in ballots under the executive order
NAACP
Organization involved in an agreement with the Postal Service regarding ballot delivery
Emmet Sullivan
U.S. District Judge who ruled the executive order violated an agreement
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictions

↳ Why This Matters

The administration's request to the Supreme Court directly impacts how mail-in ballots will be handled in the upcoming elections, potentially affecting voting access and election administration across the country.

Key facts

  • The Trump administration is seeking Supreme Court intervention to implement nationwide restrictions on mail-in voting.
  • A federal judge had previously blocked key provisions of President Trump's executive order on elections.
  • The executive order sought to create lists of verified citizens and establish a U.S. Postal Service system for mail-in ballots.
  • The administration argues that the judge's ruling prevents the implementation of new voting restrictions before the November elections.
  • A separate ruling found the executive order violated an agreement to prioritize mail-in ballot delivery.

The Trump administration has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate nationwide restrictions on mail-in voting, as outlined in a presidential executive order. This action follows a ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, who blocked key provisions of the order, arguing that President Trump lacked the constitutional authority to regulate state elections. The executive order aimed to establish a national list of verified adult citizens and create a system for the U.S. Postal Service to handle mail-in ballots exclusively from voters on pre-approved lists.

The Justice Department filed a request with the Supreme Court to put Talwani's ruling on hold while litigation proceeds. This ruling had prevented the enforcement of the order against 23 states and Washington D.C. The administration contends that the judge's decision makes it operationally impossible for the Postal Service to implement a bifurcated system for mail-in ballots, even if the administration ultimately prevails on appeal.

Adding to the legal challenges, another federal judge in Washington D.C., U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, ruled that the executive order violated a prior agreement between the Postal Service and the NAACP. This agreement mandates the federal government to ensure that voters requesting mail-in ballots receive them in time to be counted. Sullivan's decision, unlike Talwani's, applies nationwide and states that the administration's plan to send ballots only to voters on pre-approved lists breaches this commitment.

Frequently asked questions

The executive order directed the creation of a nationwide list of verified adult citizens and called for the U.S. Postal Service to handle mail-in ballots only from voters on pre-approved lists.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ruled that the president did not have the constitutional authority to regulate state elections through the executive order.

Judge Sullivan ruled that the executive order violated a previous agreement between the Postal Service and the NAACP, which ensures timely delivery of mail-in ballots.

What Happens Next

01The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether to grant the administration's request to put the judge's ruling on hold.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

President Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow implementation of an executive order tightening mail-in voting rules.
The Justice Department requested a hold on a judge's ruling that prevented enforcement of the directive in 23 states and Washington D.C.
A federal judge previously halted provisions of the executive order, arguing the president lacked constitutional authority to regulate state elections.
The executive order aimed to create lists of adult citizens and give the U.S. Postal Service authority over mail-in ballots.
Another federal judge ruled that the executive order violated an agreement to ensure timely delivery of mail-in ballots.

Sources

T1
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mail-in ballot restrictionsReuters
T2
Trump administration asks federal judge to allow mail voting ...votebeat.org

Related Stories

US appeals court rejects Trump bid to curb mail-in voting
27 Jul · 1:11 PM
Trump demands Senate cancel August break until voting bill passes
27 Jul · 4:56 PM
Trump urges Senate to pass bill making daylight saving time permanent
27 Jul · 7:37 PM
Senate to vote on Trump spy nominee Clayton
27 Jul · 10:06 AM
Trump administration uses accelerated court hearings for mass deportations
27 Jul · 9:16 AM