HomeEverything
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
← All Stories

Supreme Court Upholds Law Allowing Mail-In Ballots Arriving After Election Day

Created at 29 Jun · 2:15 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The US Supreme Court has upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots arriving within five business days after election day to be counted, provided they were postmarked by election day. The ruling sided against national Republicans and the Trump administration, impacting similar laws in over a dozen states and Washington D.C.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

fivebusiness days grace period for mail-in ballots

Who's Involved

US Supreme Court
Sided against national Republicans and the Trump administration to uphold a law on mail-in ballots.
Republican National Committee (RNC)
Challenged a Mississippi state law regarding late-arriving mail-in ballots.
Donald Trump
Challenged mail-in voting laws, though he himself cast a mail-in ballot.
Mississippi
Defended its state law allowing late-arriving mail-in ballots.
Justice Elena Kagan
Questioned the implications of ruling on ballot casting and receipt timing.
Scott G Stewart
Mississippi solicitor general, stated no historical examples of ballot recall exist.

↳ Why This Matters

The Supreme Court's decision preserves a practice used in numerous states to ensure that mail-in ballots are counted even if they arrive slightly after election day, potentially impacting election outcomes and continuing a debate over voting procedures.

Key facts

  • The US Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law that permits mail-in ballots arriving within five business days after election day to be counted, as long as they are postmarked by election day.
  • The Republican National Committee (RNC) challenged this law, arguing it violates federal statutes setting election day.
  • The ruling impacts similar laws in fourteen states, Washington D.C., and three U.S. territories.
  • Some states, including Mississippi, enacted such provisions in 2020 amid the Covid-19 pandemic.
  • Donald Trump has publicly called for an end to mail voting, despite casting a mail-in ballot himself in a recent election.

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots arriving within five business days after election day to be counted, provided they were postmarked by election day. This decision sided against national Republicans and the Trump administration, impacting similar laws in over a dozen states and Washington D.C.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) had challenged the Mississippi law, arguing that the grace period violates federal laws establishing the first Tuesday in November as election day. Mississippi, a Republican-led state, defended its right to set its own election procedures.

This ruling comes as President Donald Trump and some Republicans have frequently questioned the integrity of mail voting. However, the article notes that millions of voters across parties use mail-in ballots for convenience, and safeguards like signature verification are in place. Trump himself cast a mail-in ballot in a recent special election.

During oral arguments, conservative justices explored hypothetical scenarios related to election fraud, while liberal justices highlighted federal laws permitting grace periods and the potential impact on early voting. The RNC initially lost its case in district court before winning at the fifth circuit court of appeals, leading to the Supreme Court's review.

Frequently asked questions

The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted if they arrive within five business days after election day, provided they were postmarked by election day.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) challenged the law, arguing it violated federal election day statutes.

Fourteen states, Washington D.C., and three U.S. territories have similar laws that permit the counting of late-arriving ballots.

Donald Trump has publicly called for an end to mail voting, but he himself cast a mail-in ballot in a recent special election.

What Happens Next

01Similar laws in other states will remain in effect.
02Further legal challenges to state election laws may arise.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

The US Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots arriving after election day to be counted.
The Republican National Committee (RNC) had challenged the Mississippi law.
Mississippi defended its election procedures against the RNC's challenge.
Fourteen states, Washington D.C., and three US territories have similar laws.
Some states changed these laws in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Donald Trump has advocated for an end to mail voting.
Donald Trump cast a mail-in ballot himself in a special election.

Sources

T1
US supreme court upholds law to count mail-in ballots arriving after election dayThe Guardian

Related Stories

Supreme Court backs mail-in ballots received after Election Day
29 Jun · 1:44 PM
Supreme Court blocks Trump's attempt to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook
29 Jun · 2:30 PM
Supreme Court allows Trump to fire heads of independent agencies
29 Jun · 2:35 PM
Supreme Court backs Trump's firing of FTC member
29 Jun · 2:19 PM
Supreme Court: Constitution protects cell phone location data
29 Jun · 3:40 PM