Key facts
- Dozens of former ministers and aides attended a leaving party for Keir Starmer.
- Many attendees believe they lost their jobs due to loyalty to Starmer.
- Former ministers and aides are discussing future cooperation and scrutiny of the new government.
- Darren Jones publicly questioned the new government's fiscal policy, sparking debate.
- Some allies believe public criticism of the new administration could appear bitter.
Dozens of former ministers and aides who served under Keir Starmer gathered at a leaving party, where some learned they had lost their government jobs. The event, held hours after Starmer's departure from Downing Street, has become a focal point for discussions about the future of a group of politicians who were seen as loyal to the former prime minister.
Many attendees believe their dismissals were a deliberate purge, with some suggesting that individuals who had called for Starmer to resign were retained, while those who defended him were ousted. This sentiment has fueled discussions about how this group of approximately 11 former cabinet ministers and aides might cooperate moving forward, potentially by supporting the new government of Andy Burnham or by offering critical scrutiny.
Notable figures among those dismissed include former Chancellor Rachel Reeves, Chief Secretary Darren Jones, Attorney General Richard Hermer, and Housing Secretary Steve Reed. Other departures, such as Nick Thomas-Symonds from his role as EU chief negotiator and Hilary Benn from Northern Ireland secretary, were also noted. Some individuals who previously worked in Starmer's opposition office, like Jenny Chapman and Chris Ward, also lost their positions.
While the new prime minister, Andy Burnham, has stated his cabinet reflects the party and country and aims for a "one-team approach," the actions have led to internal debate. Darren Jones's public questioning of the government's plan to scrap the digital ID scheme to fund a VAT cut on electricity bills has drawn both support and criticism. Some allies believe such public dissent could be perceived as bitterness, while others feel it is crucial to hold the new administration accountable.
Moving forward, Starmer's former ministers and advisors are exploring various avenues to contribute. This includes potential committee roles, backbench interventions, and leveraging their detailed knowledge of government accounts and priorities to scrutinize Burnham's decisions. There is also talk of establishing a new WhatsApp group to coordinate efforts when MPs return in September. Some believe the new administration's approach to rewarding loyalty could be a decision they come to regret.