HomeEverythingEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Singapore ministers awarded damages in Bloomberg defamation suit

Created at 14 Jul · 9:06 AM2 sources↑ Market-relevant2 events
IN SHORT

Singapore ministers K Shanmugam and Tan See Leng were awarded S$460,000 (US$356,000) in damages from Bloomberg and reporter Low De Wei in a defamation suit. The case involved an article on property transactions.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

S$460,000damages awarded to Singapore ministers
US$356,000approximate damages in USD
2024year of article publication
S$88mShanmugam's bungalow sale price
S$27mTan's bungalow purchase price

Who's Involved

K Shanmugam
Singapore minister, plaintiff in defamation suit
Tan See Leng
Singapore minister, plaintiff in defamation suit
Bloomberg
News organization ordered to pay damages
Low De Wei
Bloomberg reporter, defendant in defamation suit
Singapore ministers awarded damages in Bloomberg defamation suit

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling highlights Singapore's stringent approach to defamation and the government's success in legal battles against critics and foreign media, raising concerns among some about stifling political dissent.

Key facts

  • Singapore ministers K Shanmugam and Tan See Leng sued Bloomberg and reporter Low De Wei for defamation.
  • The lawsuit concerned a 2024 article about property transactions titled "Singapore Mansion Deals Are Increasingly Shrouded in Secrecy".
  • A Singapore court ordered Bloomberg and the reporter to pay S$460,000 (approximately US$356,000) in damages.
  • The court found the article implied wrongdoing by associating the ministers' property deals with secrecy and potential money laundering.
  • Bloomberg stated it did not imply wrongdoing and used the ministers as examples of a broader trend.

A Singapore court has ordered Bloomberg and one of its reporters to pay S$460,000 (approximately US$356,000) to two ministers in a defamation lawsuit. Ministers K Shanmugam and Tan See Leng sued Bloomberg and reporter Low De Wei over a 2024 article titled "Singapore Mansion Deals Are Increasingly Shrouded in Secrecy." The article discussed wealthy buyers obscuring purchases of Good Class Bungalows, using shell companies, and mentioned the ministers' property transactions. Shanmugam, the Coordinating Minister for National Security and former law minister, had sold a bungalow for S$88 million to an unnamed buyer using a trust. Tan, the Minister for Manpower, bought a Good Class Bungalow for around S$27 million. During the trial, ministers argued the article unfairly associated their deals with concerns about transparency and money laundering, suggesting possible wrongdoing. Bloomberg and Low argued the story did not imply wrongdoing and listed them as "newsworthy examples." The judge found that the article, read as a whole, implied wrongdoing by the ministers. Separately, Singaporean authorities ordered Bloomberg to issue a correction notice under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), which Bloomberg complied with while maintaining its reporting. Singaporean leaders have a history of successfully suing critics and foreign news outlets for defamation.

Frequently asked questions

The article discussed how wealthy buyers in Singapore obscure their purchases of Good Class Bungalows, often using shell companies, and mentioned property deals involving ministers K Shanmugam and Tan See Leng.

They argued the article unfairly associated their property deals with concerns about transparency and money laundering, implying wrongdoing.

Bloomberg argued the story did not imply wrongdoing by the ministers and that they were listed as "newsworthy examples" of bungalow deals.

POFMA, or the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act, is a Singaporean law used to tackle misinformation by mandating correction notices on online content deemed false by authorities.

What Happens Next

01Bloomberg may appeal the court's decision.
02Further legal actions against media outlets or critics in Singapore could follow.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Singapore ministers K Shanmugam and Tan See Leng sued Bloomberg and reporter Low De Wei over a 2024 article.
The article, titled "Singapore Mansion Deals Are Increasingly Shrouded in Secrecy", referenced their property deals.
Bloomberg stated the article did not imply wrongdoing and used the ministers as examples of a broader trend.
A Singapore court ordered Bloomberg and Low De Wei to pay S$460,000 in damages to the ministers.
The judge found the article implied wrongdoing by associating the ministers' deals with secrecy and money laundering concerns.
Singaporean authorities separately ordered Bloomberg to issue a correction notice under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).
Bloomberg complied with the POFMA order but maintained it stood by its reporting.
Singaporean leaders have a history of successfully suing critics and foreign news outlets for defamation.

Sources

T1
Singapore court orders Bloomberg to pay $356,000 to ministers in defamation caseBBC News
T1
Singapore ministers each awarded US$177,860 in damages in Bloomberg defamation suitSouth China Morning Post

Related Stories

Court suspends FTC's designation of Coupang founder as 'identical person'
14 Jul · 6:31 AM
US government rescinds $10 billion freeze for 5 Democratic-led states
14 Jul · 3:12 AM
Brazil's Supreme Court bars Senator Bolsonaro from visiting his father
13 Jul · 7:00 PM
US refunds $81bn in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling
14 Jul · 12:46 AM
Venezuela's Rodriguez taps envoy for foreign relations post
13 Jul · 9:33 PM