HomeEverything
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
← All Stories

MRED seeks arbitration in Zillow antitrust lawsuit

Created at 30 Jun · 7:35 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED) has asked a court to compel Zillow into arbitration over its antitrust lawsuit, arguing that Zillow agreed to arbitrate disputes arising from their data access agreements. Zillow contends these agreements are unenforceable.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Who's Involved

MRED
Chicagoland MLS seeking arbitration in Zillow antitrust lawsuit
Zillow
Listing portal giant facing antitrust lawsuit and arbitration request
Compass International Holdings
Co-defendant in Zillow's antitrust lawsuit
John Tharp
Judge overseeing the case
MRED seeks arbitration in Zillow antitrust lawsuit

↳ Why This Matters

The outcome of MRED's arbitration request could determine whether the antitrust dispute between the MLS and Zillow is resolved privately or in public court, potentially impacting transparency and the resolution of claims regarding data access and alleged anti-competitive practices.

Key facts

  • MRED is seeking arbitration in its antitrust lawsuit against Zillow.
  • MRED claims Zillow agreed to arbitrate disputes related to data access agreements.
  • Zillow argues the arbitration clauses are unenforceable due to ambiguity.
  • MRED requested the court to stay non-arbitrable claims and deny Zillow's preliminary injunction.
  • A hearing on Zillow's preliminary injunction motion is set to commence.

Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED) has requested arbitration in its ongoing antitrust lawsuit with Zillow, just days before a scheduled hearing on Zillow's preliminary injunction motion. In filings submitted on Monday, MRED asserted that Zillow had previously agreed to arbitrate any disputes arising from their IDX and VOW agreements.

Zillow, however, has contested the enforceability of these arbitration clauses, citing ambiguity in the contract's wording. MRED countered this by stating that legal principles and case law support its entitlement to enforce these arbitration clauses, particularly given the intended third-party beneficiary status.

Furthermore, MRED differentiated its "Participation Agreement," which governs access to the MLS database, from its IDX access agreements that are central to the lawsuit and contain their own mandatory arbitration clauses. MRED has asked Judge John Tharp to halt all non-arbitrable claims and reject Zillow's preliminary injunction request, arguing it would be redundant given a prior temporary restraining order already prevented MRED from suspending its listing feed to Zillow.

A Zillow spokesperson criticized MRED's move as an attempt to conduct the proceedings privately, away from public scrutiny. The spokesperson emphasized the public's right to know about the actions of MRED and Compass and to see the matter resolved in open court. The court had not yet ruled on MRED's motion as of Tuesday afternoon. The two-day hearing on Zillow's preliminary injunction, filed in May, was slated to begin Wednesday. The lawsuit itself, also filed in May, alleges that MRED and Compass conspired to withhold listing data and pressured Zillow to display private listings.

Frequently asked questions

MRED is seeking to compel Zillow into arbitration and to have the court stay all non-arbitrable claims while denying Zillow's preliminary injunction request.

Zillow argues that the arbitration agreements are unenforceable due to ambiguity in the language of the contracts.

Zillow claims MRED and Compass conspired to withhold listing data and pressured Zillow to carry private listings.

What Happens Next

01The court is expected to rule on MRED's motion to compel arbitration.
02A two-day hearing on Zillow's preliminary injunction motion is scheduled to begin.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

MRED sought to compel arbitration in its antitrust lawsuit with Zillow.
MRED argued that Zillow agreed to arbitrate disputes arising from IDX and VOW agreements.
Zillow claimed the arbitration agreements are unenforceable due to ambiguous language.
MRED stated its Participation Agreement is separate from IDX access agreements with arbitration clauses.
MRED asked the court to stay non-arbitrable claims and deny Zillow's preliminary injunction request.
Zillow accused MRED of trying to move the case behind closed doors.
A hearing on Zillow's preliminary injunction motion was scheduled to begin.

Sources

T1
MRED seeks arbitration in Zillow antitrust lawsuitHousingWire

Related Stories

CFPB seeks to expand mortgage credit access amid staffing constraints
29 Jun · 8:05 PM
TikTok settles minor's lawsuit over social media harm ahead of trial
30 Jun · 7:57 PM
Australia sues Amazon unit over alleged breach via Prime Video ads
29 Jun · 11:14 PM
Meta loses bid to dismiss US states' claims that Facebook, Instagram addict children
30 Jun · 1:01 PM
Michigan judge blocks Kalshi from offering sports betting
29 Jun · 9:54 PM